Track_Shovel to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoAre you threatening me?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up11.41Karrow-down10cross-posted to: selfawarewolves@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.41Karrow-down1imageAre you threatening me?slrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square94fedilinkcross-posted to: selfawarewolves@lemmy.world
minus-square@MonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months ago his debate skills are <6th grader, so he literally is Now that’s a logical fallacy.
minus-square@NOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 months agoLiterally is now just an intensifier in most contexts. We’ve lost the war
minus-squarePastafARRianlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months agoHe literally might as well be in his capacity to debate and process emotions, which is his only relevant skills here. But the other way was shorter to write.
minus-square@MonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoWhat i meant was, bad at debating = dumb, that’s not how it works.
minus-squarePastafARRianlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoI think what I meant is, are there any important differences between him and a 12 year old in this context?
Now that’s a logical fallacy.
Literally is now just an intensifier in most contexts. We’ve lost the war
He literally might as well be in his capacity to debate and process emotions, which is his only relevant skills here. But the other way was shorter to write.
What i meant was, bad at debating = dumb, that’s not how it works.
I think what I meant is, are there any important differences between him and a 12 year old in this context?