@hempster@lemm.ee to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agoBackblaze responds to claims of “sham accounting,” customer backups at risk - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down10cross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1106arrow-down1external-linkBackblaze responds to claims of “sham accounting,” customer backups at risk - Ars Technicaarstechnica.com@hempster@lemm.ee to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-square@narc0tic_bird@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 month agoSame. It’s pretty cheap, comes with unlimited free traffic and is just simple to use. Supports many ways to access it, including BorgBackup.
minus-squareSayCyberOnceMorelinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoCan I (figuratively speaking) just change the destination in my backup scripts and start writing to Hetzner… or are they using a completely different setup?
minus-squareMilanlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-210 days agotho hetzner storagebox is hit or miss. you can run into deadlocks from cifs mounts on servers with it
Personally I use Hetzner Storage Box
Same. It’s pretty cheap, comes with unlimited free traffic and is just simple to use. Supports many ways to access it, including BorgBackup.
Can I (figuratively speaking) just change the destination in my backup scripts and start writing to Hetzner… or are they using a completely different setup?
tho hetzner storagebox is hit or miss. you can run into deadlocks from cifs mounts on servers with it