@alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish • 1 month agoTariffs could increase tech prices by up to 70% and reduce GDP by $69 billion according to CTA reportwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1296arrow-down10
arrow-up1296arrow-down1external-linkTariffs could increase tech prices by up to 70% and reduce GDP by $69 billion according to CTA reportwww.tomshardware.com@alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@novacomets@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoWhy do you use wikipedia as a source given the statement from staff who run wikipedia?
minus-square@Seleni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 month agoObviously you’ve never heard of the concept of ‘citing credible sources’.
minus-square@novacomets@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoIt’s because of the concept of credible sources that I ask why you use wikipedia given the statement from staff that run wikipedia
minus-square@Seleni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 month agoThat’s an ad hominem and not a valid argument. I know the internet breeds bad habits in people, but you really should try to do better. ‘What the staff says’ has nothing to do with citing and linking to primary sources, which is what is important and the focus of this discussion.
minus-square@inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-21 month agoJust donvote, tag for future downvotes and move on. A defender of Neo-Nazis isn’t ever going to defend their stance with facts and reality.
minus-square@Seleni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoThat wasn’t for the Nazi, it was for other people reading what the Nazi wrote. I don’t want people to get taken in by the poorly structured arguments and the constant moving of goalposts.
Why do you use wikipedia as a source given the statement from staff who run wikipedia?
Obviously you’ve never heard of the concept of ‘citing credible sources’.
It’s because of the concept of credible sources that I ask why you use wikipedia given the statement from staff that run wikipedia
That’s an ad hominem and not a valid argument. I know the internet breeds bad habits in people, but you really should try to do better.
‘What the staff says’ has nothing to do with citing and linking to primary sources, which is what is important and the focus of this discussion.
Just donvote, tag for future downvotes and move on. A defender of Neo-Nazis isn’t ever going to defend their stance with facts and reality.
That wasn’t for the Nazi, it was for other people reading what the Nazi wrote. I don’t want people to get taken in by the poorly structured arguments and the constant moving of goalposts.