• Lovable Sidekick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Shhhh, the primary social media population wants to believe life was a breeze until they came along.

    • @Redredme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 month ago

      There was no oil crisis, no cold war, no economic crash in the 80s, no housing shortage in the 80s, no rampant crime!

      The 70/80s where glorious!

      /Sssss

      • Lovable Sidekick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        I definitely enjoyed myself, more in the 80s than the 70s (which seemed largely like the record industry still trying to milk money out of the 60s).

        • @Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Well if you enjoyed the 80s soooo much then a) you where too young to grasp the problems facing your parents or b) you where too well off.

          Just look at the cinema and listen to the music of my fine period.

          Everything, every theme was: please dont kill us and can i have a room to call my own.

          The politics where insane, mortgage rates of 10-15% where the norm, enormous economic shifts.

          The 90s where fun but the eighties where, in my experience, very, very dark.

          Ever listened to, I dunno, two tribes, war, dancing with tears in my eyes, Russians, etc.? Those first albums of u2? Really grasped what Terminator was about? Wall Street? Or the much lighter but still terribly fucked Trading Places?

          It was all really dark stuff, my brother. Fun, but very dark.

          • Lovable Sidekick
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I was a regular guy in my 20s/30s working as a computer programmer, living in a house with roommates and doing a lot of theatre. Amazingly there were more than your two possibilities, and I would hazard a guess that there are even more. LPT: simplistic binary thinking makes people boring.

            • @Redredme@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Yep, regular guy in the 80s doing programming.

              Thats even now not so regular, that was very special and very high paying back then.

              So amazingly, you being in your 70s (80s where 40 years ago after all) now and still unable to really fathom, comprehend, how very very good you probably still have it compared to others is telling enough. And that was one of the two binary options i gave for the 80s: too young too comprehend, too rich to care. You clearly fell and probably still fall in the latter category.

              Not a lot 70+ year olds on Lemmy btw.

              That all, combined with the use of the lpt acronym makes me doubt your age. That, or i’m talking to a llm.

              Binary is boring that is true. It also has a 50% chance of being right the first time.

              • Lovable Sidekick
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                Obviously you know my life better at a glance than I do, having lived it. Meme-level thinking at its best! Take in minimal information, make a value judgement based almost entirely on preconceptions, and scroll on to the next item. This is why we have Trump (again) - because too many people dismissed all the issues as simple good/evil decisions so they could get back to entertaining themselves.

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      It’s also forgetting the Korean war, and several smaller wars in between (Panama, Honduras).

      Vietnam was bad, but don’t forget so easily that we only just got out of the longest running war the US was ever been in, and it wasn’t Boomers or Gen X fighting in it. It spanned two generations. Now, because there US just can’t not be involved in a conflict, we’re casting about trying to find a good enemy; I think the next one will be with a developed country. We’ve realized that we don’t do so well with insurgencies, so maybe Russia or China. Or, maybe India and Pakistan will finish everything for us! They both have nukes, and China isn’t just going to sit there while they trade nukes across the border.

      Anyway, it’s a little depressing that y’all have already written off the 800,000 veterans who fought in Afghanistan as being unworthy of notice.

      • @BussyCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 month ago

        The Korean War “ended” in 1953 the oldest boomer would have been 7 year olds, about half of them were the right age for Vietnam but even with that only about 2.7m served in some capacity for the Vietnam war with a lot in non combat roles there were 76m baby boom era so less than 4%

      • Lovable Sidekick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If you want to nitpick in that area, US soldiers in the Middle East over the past 30 years have all been enlistees, average age around 30. The average age of US soldiers in Vietnam was 19, most of whom were drafted. No American high school students since 1973 have had to watch lottery balls on TV decide whether they get sent to war.

    • @CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Life has always been a struggle, but it truly feels hopeless being 20 something given the current state of the world. There’s some days where I spend 80% of the day consumed by suicidal thoughts.

      • @Shortstack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        And you can’t admit it to anyone, lest you end up involuntarily committed for a couple days and also handed the bill for the stay 🙃