@ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world • 21 days agoHilary isn't playingslrpnk.netimagemessage-square296fedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1imageHilary isn't playingslrpnk.net@ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world • 21 days agomessage-square296fedilink
minus-square@Kentifer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•20 days agoThat was the impression I got from what you wrote as well. Could you try saying it another way? Because it seems some of us aren’t getting it.
minus-square@Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•20 days agoWhy do people want to keep Hilary relevant?
minus-square@Kentifer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•20 days agoRight. I think a lot of people wonder about that. But you seemed to be driving at a point. Specifically this bit: Waiting for the day some doofus tries to tell me why we can’t find better representation from the 350,000,000 people in the united states. What did you mean by this if you weren’t implying she was going to run again?
minus-square@Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•20 days agoRepresentation, meaning, someone who represents your ideas.
minus-square@Kentifer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•20 days agoI think a lot of people, myself included, interpreted that as “politcal representation.” Sorry for misinterpreting. Thanks for clearing it up.
That was the impression I got from what you wrote as well. Could you try saying it another way? Because it seems some of us aren’t getting it.
Why do people want to keep Hilary relevant?
Right. I think a lot of people wonder about that. But you seemed to be driving at a point. Specifically this bit:
What did you mean by this if you weren’t implying she was going to run again?
Representation, meaning, someone who represents your ideas.
I think a lot of people, myself included, interpreted that as “politcal representation.” Sorry for misinterpreting. Thanks for clearing it up.
Np =]