If it makes you feel any better, from a quick scan through some of the images the vast majority of them at least seem depict the characters as older and grown up.
I agree but the availability of csam on the internet (real or simulated) reduces the instances of real-world abuse so… take that as you will I guess :/
Edit: I learned that in college about 7 years ago, but I researched it again and apparently the opposite is true, according to more recent evidence.
Also there is probably some level of inflation from the characters being present even if they aren’t necessarily part of the act. IE a porn comic where Bart and Lisa are complaining about thumping, cut to Marge and Homer fucking.
I rather like my hentai and have seen this type of thing frequently enough to say it’s semi common. Though I am not into Simpsons personally, a bit too abstract and too far away from human coloration to enjoy.
Does it? I used to see this argument a lot on Reddit back in the early days when there were a lot more pedos on there and I don’t really buy it. Are there any actual studies on this? I feel like there have got to be better ways at managing it than that at least from a clinical standpoint
No clue, but for what it’s worth we know violent video games don’t cause more violence and some studies show they can even reduce it at least so I’d imagine it would extrapolate similarly to other visual media
The difference is that (almost) everyone has an innate drive towards having sex that they don’t have towards doing violent things. It’s a totally different biochemical process to get horny than to get violent.
Having taken care of many children, I strongly disagree. Not just punching someone rather than talking it out is a learned thing that’s also reinforced by society (for the most part).
If there wasn’t an innate violence within humans, human history would look very different, and fascism wouldn’t exist.
Also, both processes can activate the adrenal axis actually. It’s not totally different, and there’s some similarities.
There’s an episode in season 10 where Meg turns 18, and Quagmire ends up taking her to his remote sex cabin. Peter and Lois end up breaking in and threatening Quagmire to stay away from her.
The fraction of teenage/underage girls on that list is too damn high (hell, Louise is 9)
If it makes you feel any better, from a quick scan through some of the images the vast majority of them at least seem depict the characters as older and grown up.
I agree but the availability of csam on the internet (real or simulated) reduces the instances of real-world abuse so… take that as you will I guess :/Edit: I learned that in college about 7 years ago, but I researched it again and apparently the opposite is true, according to more recent evidence.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10701425/
I’m not arguing against rule 34ing these characters.
But I refuse to believe that the fraction of actual pedophiles on rule34 is that high such that three of the top 11 haven’t even hit puberty yet.
I think that lots of these numbers comes from some sort of taboo breaking.
Also there is probably some level of inflation from the characters being present even if they aren’t necessarily part of the act. IE a porn comic where Bart and Lisa are complaining about thumping, cut to Marge and Homer fucking.
I rather like my hentai and have seen this type of thing frequently enough to say it’s semi common. Though I am not into Simpsons personally, a bit too abstract and too far away from human coloration to enjoy.
Does it? I used to see this argument a lot on Reddit back in the early days when there were a lot more pedos on there and I don’t really buy it. Are there any actual studies on this? I feel like there have got to be better ways at managing it than that at least from a clinical standpoint
Same guy here. Looked it up and no. My info was out of date.
No clue, but for what it’s worth we know violent video games don’t cause more violence and some studies show they can even reduce it at least so I’d imagine it would extrapolate similarly to other visual media
The difference is that (almost) everyone has an innate drive towards having sex that they don’t have towards doing violent things. It’s a totally different biochemical process to get horny than to get violent.
Having taken care of many children, I strongly disagree. Not just punching someone rather than talking it out is a learned thing that’s also reinforced by society (for the most part).
If there wasn’t an innate violence within humans, human history would look very different, and fascism wouldn’t exist.
Also, both processes can activate the adrenal axis actually. It’s not totally different, and there’s some similarities.
Out of 11 we have:
Maggie Simpson Lisa Simpson Louise Belcher
And maybe Hayley Smith and Meg Griffin? Or are they 18?
Anyways, that’s a really high proportion, like a thirdish.
You almost gave me a heart attack. It’s Marge. (that said, I trust internet perverts enough to go for adult Maggie)
Edit: oh… it’s the blurred out one
Hayley is like 19/20. Meg is in high school
Meg is 18yo btw
There’s this joke once where Quagmire asks Meg if she’s 18 yet. She says nope and he walks away.
lmao, there is an entire episode about meg 18th birthday and quagmire hunting her to bang her.
Yeah, I stopped watching Family Guy like 15 years ago. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
There’s an episode in season 10 where Meg turns 18, and Quagmire ends up taking her to his remote sex cabin. Peter and Lois end up breaking in and threatening Quagmire to stay away from her.
Learning about family guy lore wasn’t on my bingo card today.
So… when do the rule 34s canonically take place? /j
No, because Chris is the older brother and still goes to high school.
how are you sure about that
Hayley is in college. Afaik Meg is underage though.
Hayley would get it tho.
Millenial Hippie chick with daddy issues? Sign me up.
Shitty taste in men too