Presumptuous of you to assert that the plaintiff actually was asked to provide a greater amount of evidence, considering you don’t have any evidence to support that aside from the fact that the plaintiff said so
Not my point at all, try again. I said the point of the case for SCOTUS was to decide whether majority groups had a higher standard of evidence to meet discrimination claims. Which Justice Kagan stated quite clearly:
The only question the Supreme Court had agreed to decide, Kagan said, “is whether a majority-group plaintiff has to show something more than a minority-group plaintiff, here, whether a straight person has to show more than a gay person.”
Presumptuous of you to assert that the plaintiff actually was asked to provide a greater amount of evidence, considering you don’t have any evidence to support that aside from the fact that the plaintiff said so
Not my point at all, try again. I said the point of the case for SCOTUS was to decide whether majority groups had a higher standard of evidence to meet discrimination claims. Which Justice Kagan stated quite clearly:
removed by mod
🤦🏻♂️ Alright, dude, bye.
Bye!