• TrackinDaKraken
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1666 days ago

    More like he knows his audience. Snake oil salesmen know they’re selling garbage.

    • esa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      646 days ago

      Yep. The colour theory stuff in there makes MBTI and horoscopes look detailed and well-documented in comparison

      • @Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        376 days ago

        Hey I just want a simple way to understand myself, others, and my place in the world without having to do any personal introspection.

      • @mriswith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        For anyone curious, it’s the “DISC assesment”, partly developed by William Moulton Marston. The guy behind the polygraph and Wonder Woman.

        It’s based on his obsession with bondage and how he thought it was the solution to a “peaceful human society”:

        Dominance: active use of force to overcome resistance in the environment

        Inducement: use of charm in order to deal with obstacles

        Submission: warm and voluntary acceptance of the need to fulfill a request

        Compliance: fearful adjustment to a superior force.

        • @loonsun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 days ago

          Yeah most reputable assessment developers have long moved away from shit like DiSC and MBTI, they were never grounded in science and just make the average person think ideas like personality are just pure snake oil when they are very complex nuanced topics.

          If anyone wants to know about way more valid measures look up HEXACO and take the 60 or 100 item measure if you want to actually get an understanding of your own personality (note anything less than 60 items for a personality test is either not a general test or BS)

    • @funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 days ago

      I did some searching, apparently the four colors represented are things like “Reds think speed limits are for people who don’t know how to drive”, and “Blues think people who don’t read the entire contract before signing are idiots” - which contains kernels of truth; it also says that most people have a selection of traits from at least two colors. So basically it’s just a serious version of “white guys drive like this, but black guys drive like this”

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I worked some place that did something similar, if not this exact thing. We answered a 20 question quiz of "do you do x, or y? Very in-depth, of course.

        It’s not an “all or none” situation, but it’s supposed to be used as a guideline about how to best interact with different people. Blue/green would prefer a steady, consistent approach. Red/yellow want things fast and aggressive, etc.

        What actually happened was people preening about getting the “good colors” that had traits that the company liked, and then absolutely no change at all in the culture or how we treated people anyway, regardless of results.

        It was a complete waste of time, but the execs got big wall sized color charts and pinned everyone’s names to them, so I guess they enjoyed their made up work for a bit.