The march to Nazism takes another step

  • @theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    82 days ago

    Sorry, but that is only true for a narrow, archaic band of the term IQ. Though I admit that within that narrow interpretation, you’re right. But there have been many tests devised since then to attempt to address those concerns.

      • @theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        62 days ago

        Maybe, in varying degrees, but also some success. Though intelligence itself is tough to pin down in the broader sense, there are some aspects of the measurement that are useful in both clinical settings and in research.

        • @jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          Sure. I’m not saying they aren’t useful in a clinical setting. Just that they don’t measure intelligence.

          It can definitely be useful to measure how much knowledge someone has of Western culture

          • @theherk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            22 days ago

            Yeah, and I don’t mean to be too argumentative, but that is still a narrow perspective. They are also useful across cultures in the case of some tests. They are also useful beyond just knowledge. For example, for determining learning aptitude. There are many comments of intelligence. Some are more easy than others to measure objectively.

            Again, you’re definitely right for a subset of IQ tests. I’m just saying in the broader sense they can be useful and even measure “intelligence” in some useful ways. At least, this is what I’ve understood from some reading, not as some expert on the topic.