• andyburke
    link
    fedilink
    34 days ago

    Yeah, I get it.

    But what I am saying is: if we just enforced the existing rules we wouldn’t need to be talking about banning whole classes of people, right?

    There is nothing about the situation you described that is exclusively caused by children.

    • @jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 days ago

      Many kids are just normal kids, sometimes they are loud. But then there are some who are absolute hellspawn, because of their parents. But we can’t make rules that say “useless parents with hellspawn not allowed” so we have to say “no children”.

      It’s like alcohol. Most people are responsible with it and don’t get drunk and misbehave, but a minority ruins it for everyone else by puking, smashing bottles, and just generally being a nuisance, so the rules have to say no alcohol at all.

    • @Taco2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yes, in this one very specific situation, enforcing the rules would’ve helped. It’s still doesn’t change the fact that if it was an adults only campground, this one very specific situation wouldn’t have happened in the first place.

      Children aren’t a protected class and there are plenty of business and establishments that they are not allowed to be in, usually because it’s illegal for underage people to be there. But, what is wrong with a private business, like a campground or a a restaurant being adults only? How is detrimental to the kids?

    • @BigShammy80@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      Yeah, that would be the best case scenario, but we live in reality, where you just don’t get these things.