• Farmington Hills officials are fuming over a glut of unsold Cybertrucks being stored in the city.
  • Tesla has been parking the EVs at a shopping center earmarked for major redevelopment.
  • Officials say the electric vehicles violate zoning codes and are warning the property owner.
  • @Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    629 days ago

    God the environmental damage caused by making all these batteries, only to be used in a cyber truck and dumped in a car park.

    Remember when Elon was pretending to be saving the environment, well now he isn’t.

    • @muusemuuse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      339 days ago

      Batteries can be recycled, reused or repurposed. It’s nowhere near as damaging as drilling for/refining/shipping/burning oil and we decided we are perfectly okay with that.

      • @utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        109 days ago

        Batteries can be recycled, reused or repurposed. It’s nowhere near as damaging as drilling for/refining/shipping/burning oil

        Why is the alternative to an EV SUV a combustion engine SUV? Why isn’t cycling and public transport?

        I’m not saving ICEs are good and EV are bad but that maybe… both aren’t great anyway, especially when actual alternatives that make people healthier do exist.

          • @utopiah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            18 days ago

            Anything else but driving doesn’t work well in the US because the “way of life” is indeed car centric. It will never change without infrastructure, including but not limited to bike lanes. Large distances are possible with (electric) bike but this at least needs to be safe.

            So… yes I’m not advocating for somebody leaving the middle of absolute nowhere to give up on their cars. This is not even about cities (as the article mentions a parking lot I assume it’s next or even inside a city).

            No, my point instead is to question the false dichotomy.

            • @muusemuuse@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 days ago

              I agree we shouldn’t have set things up as we did but it’s done and there is no way I’m biking what would be a 40 minute drive to microcenter.

              • @utopiah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                18 days ago

                I did spend last week biking 45min somewhere and back (so 1h30) for 4 days in a row. It’s not for everyone … but not only it’s feasible but (and I know it will sound crazy to some) I actually did enjoy it. On the last day I even did the last trip with a new friend, chatting the entire ride.

                Again, I’m not arguing that anybody should do that, or have fun doing, only that’s it not impossible.

      • @bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        68 days ago

        Agreed. The person you’re responding to is using the same logic as “wind turbines kill birds”, “EVs run on FF electricity”, etc. Anyone trying to convince you to let perfection get in the way of progress is almost certainly being disingenuous, or at best has been talked into it by someone who was.

      • @GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The lithium mining process is laborious, dangerous, and releases radioactive elements into groundwater and into the air as mine tailings. Not to mention, most of Earth’s lithium reserves are in Chile, Bolivia, and Rwanda. With Western investors backing corrupt national governments, this means that exploitative labor (read: slavery) is the primary means of extraction.

        It is, in comparison to other extraction methods, literally just as bad.

        • @muusemuuse@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 days ago

          Actually lithium isn’t the long term plan, it’s just the plan for today. Sodium is the long term. But huge lithium deposits exists in the US and China too.

          • SkaveRat
            link
            fedilink
            28 days ago

            You can even filter it out of the oceans. It’s just not worth the cost right now

      • @innermachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        49 days ago

        I thought it was widely accepted that lithium mining is far more harmful to the environment than drilling for oil, and that the hope was that not burning oil/gas we offset the mining (to the point if u drive ur electric car x miles it’s cleaner overall than if u drive an ICE vehicle). Do you have information that states otherwise?

              • @innermachine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                17 days ago

                Alright here’s more effort than you could be bothered with- drilling oil out of the ground involved a drill that goes deep into the ground. Their not all that big. Have you seen a lithium mine before? Massive hole in the earth miles wide and quite deep, a hole in the earth that will be visible for centuries. A big open wound on the planet that cannot heal itself. I know this is a tough comparison because oil is more of a consumable, and lithium for batteries sure it’s technically a consumable but with a much longer life than say a 50 gal drum of oil. I’m not taking into account refining for either material, or the waste involved with disposing of batteries or emissions of cars burning gas. It’s an apples to oranges comparison and hard to say which is worse at the end of the day. What is a fact, however, is that producing an electric car is more harmful to the environment than producing an ice car. And keeping an old ice car alive is better for the environment than producing any new car. Both lithium mining and oil drilling quite frankly awful for the environment. So do you have the gusto to help me understand and produce a productive conversation or are u happy to just troll? It is an incredibly complex issue to account for the exact environmental impact of either, but an issue that intrigues me and I think an important conversation to have.

                • @frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 days ago

                  Your post is still just speculation based on personal understanding. I can claim every word of it is wrong and be just as credible.

                  Are you going to post an actual study comparing the manufacturing costs? You made the claim first, so you get to do the work first.

                  • @innermachine@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    16 days ago

                    Yea but we both know you wont, because your just as credible. It’s a fact that it you average ev has twice the carbon footprint of a ice car, and takes 3 years roughly to offset its carbon emissions assuming 15k miles driven a year. At 10 years, carbon footprint of an ice car is roughly double that of the ev, but from 10 years on your subject to battery failure and now need to dispose of a big nasty battery pack and replace it. It will take a few decades to see what the true footprint of evs are, and there is no published studies with the long term effects because we haven’t gotten there yet. This is the closest thing I found upon a brief search, so fesrlst yer eyes on a graph. Keep in mind that’s based off a Nissan leaf and fiat 500, you could choose a more economical car with smaller footprint and a larger footprint ev to skew results in my favor, or compare the leaf to a truck or whatever ur average American drives and steer the conversation towards evs but I think it’s a reasonable apple to apples comparison. This whole conversation has been speculation and I thank you for ur engagement 👍 https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/electric-vehicles-contribute-fewer-emissions-than-gasoline-powered-cars-over-their-lifetimes/

        • @Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          49 days ago

          I’ve got a nonsense idea with no sources do you have sources to contradict it?

          Start with sources that back-up the nonsense you just made up. Because there is just no possible way that extracting 1 EV’s worth of lithium is equivalent pollution to the expected 200-400 thousand miles of ICE driving it offsets.

        • @PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Oil spills are far worse for the environment than mining could be. Also, electric cars keep air pollution in cities down. Not saying there is zero environmental impact but mining is not nearly as bad as fossil fuels can be, and same could be said for nuclear as well.

    • @13igTyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      EVs were never about saving the environment. It does so much damage making a new EV. If companies wanted to save the environment they would have invested in refurbishing and updating older used cars.

      EDIT: Sad how many ignorant people are down voting this without even attempting to look up the environmental cost of making a brand new car loading with rare earth minerals. While destroying a slightly older car that’s already been built and whose environmental impact has already been dealt with and would best be put to use rather than sit in a junk yard for 50 years.

      Too many corporate boot lickers believing the car companies based on nothing more than “Green” buzz words.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          fedilink
          59 days ago

          It is technically recyclable, but it’s so cost prohibitive compared to just building new that no one really does it at this point. Maybe someday.

          • @frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            39 days ago

            It’s almost certainly something that will get worked out on its own. There isn’t enough volume to justify lithium battery recycling at this point. After a decade of EVs being mainstream, there will be.

            That said, GP is correct that EVs are about saving the car industry, not about saving the environment. Getting better walking/biking/public transportation infrastructure is the way to go. Ebikes, in particular, open up biking transportation to a lot of people who hesitated before. The amount of lithium used in them is tiny compared to cars, and the market can likely be served by sodium-ion batts, anyway.

      • @innermachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        59 days ago

        The most environmentally friendly thing you can do as a car owner is just keep the oldest car u have alive as long as possible. Cash for lunkers wasn’t about getting people in cleaner cars, it was about subsidizing companies so they could sell more while destroying perfectly good vehicles. This shredded the used car market and we are paying for it now. Literally. If you need to get a new car anyways, sure an ev or hybrid might be the way. But keeping a stinky old diesel running, while it may seem counterintuitive, is the cleaner thing to do. What we wmit driving pails in comparison to the production pollution associated with all these throw away cars.

        • StinkyFingerItchyBum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 days ago

          The most environmentally friendly thing you can do as a car owner is stop being one. Ride a bike. Take Mass Transit. Walk.

          • @innermachine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            17 days ago

            Spoken like a true pedestrian. I live in one of the bigger “cities” in my state and it’s smaller than a “small town” in the last state I lived in, not having a car here is impossible. The most environmentally friendly thing to do would be abandon all technology and eat berries in a cave and die at 30 because of poor hygiene, your comment is irrelevant to the conversation at hand.

            • StinkyFingerItchyBum
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 days ago

              Don’t worry about it. You’ll be dead from a multiple simultaneous crises. Your car won’t save you.

              We in the “rich” world already have a housing crisis where masses would love a cave over their current sleeping rough. Berries would be nice too and hunger is all too well known in the developed world.

              You are way out of touch. Congratulations to be so fortunate.