stupid for living 1,000-5,000 years ago, and having zero education, or for thinking that other people would buy that bullshit
This is why I’m always a bit askance when presented with Atheism as some kind of enlightened philosophy.
Just kicking in the door and shouting “Everyone who conceived of a being more powerful than themselves and attempted to extrapolate the natural world into an explainable series of events was FUCKING DUMB AS SHIT” is kinda simple-minded and divorced from any historical perspective on its face.
Nevermind the chauvinism and the egotism of this bland dogmatic assertion. You’re casually dismissing whole intermediate strains of philosophical and literary development, because people 5000 years ago weren’t spoon-fed a level of education (mixed with its own heady brand of western War on Terror propaganda) you received a few years ago.
That’s why religions brainwash small children using fear.
Trying to explain to my five year old why transendentalism is going to ruin their life and perpetuate generations of human suffering without scaring them. Maybe if I lead in with “Catholics are going to rape you! Stay away from the church!” they’ll get the core logic and reason without experiencing any kind of reflexive emotional response.
Trying to explain to my five year old why transendentalism is going to ruin their life and perpetuate generations of human suffering without scaring them. Maybe if I lead in with “Catholics are going to rape you! Stay away from the church!” they’ll get the core logic and reason without experiencing any kind of reflexive emotional response.
Are you fucking for real? Yeah, let’s compare some theoretical woo to centuries of very real sexual abuse by the Catholic (and lets be real, every fucking other) church.
How is “transendentalism” going to ruin your child’s life and perpetuate generations of human suffering? What the fuck are you even talking about? Like the type of meditation that hippies thought was magic?
This is why I’m always a bit askance when presented with Atheism as some kind of enlightened philosophy.
Its not a philosophy, its a position on the existence of god.
is kinda simple-minded and divorced from any historical perspective on its face.
Its simple because its only a statement of belief in no god in the form of identification. A historical perspective is not needed to come to a conclusion as to whether people who believe in god are stupid or smart. You can also do that through thinking about their rationality or logical process for coming to those conclusions.
You’re casually dismissing whole intermediate strains of philosophical and literary development
If I wrote a philosophy or theology about how everything is made of bananas, and then for hundreds/thousands of years people argued about the nuances of my absurd and baseless belief system I think it’d be fair to dismiss it anyway. It doesn’t matter how much fan fiction is written about Musaceae-ology. You don’t have to read it, you can safely ignore it.
This is why I’m always a bit askance when presented with Atheism as some kind of enlightened philosophy.
Just kicking in the door and shouting “Everyone who conceived of a being more powerful than themselves and attempted to extrapolate the natural world into an explainable series of events was FUCKING DUMB AS SHIT” is kinda simple-minded and divorced from any historical perspective on its face.
Nevermind the chauvinism and the egotism of this bland dogmatic assertion. You’re casually dismissing whole intermediate strains of philosophical and literary development, because people 5000 years ago weren’t spoon-fed a level of education (mixed with its own heady brand of western War on Terror propaganda) you received a few years ago.
Trying to explain to my five year old why transendentalism is going to ruin their life and perpetuate generations of human suffering without scaring them. Maybe if I lead in with “Catholics are going to rape you! Stay away from the church!” they’ll get the core logic and reason without experiencing any kind of reflexive emotional response.
Are you fucking for real? Yeah, let’s compare some theoretical woo to centuries of very real sexual abuse by the Catholic (and lets be real, every fucking other) church.
How is “transendentalism” going to ruin your child’s life and perpetuate generations of human suffering? What the fuck are you even talking about? Like the type of meditation that hippies thought was magic?
Its not a philosophy, its a position on the existence of god.
Its simple because its only a statement of belief in no god in the form of identification. A historical perspective is not needed to come to a conclusion as to whether people who believe in god are stupid or smart. You can also do that through thinking about their rationality or logical process for coming to those conclusions.
If I wrote a philosophy or theology about how everything is made of bananas, and then for hundreds/thousands of years people argued about the nuances of my absurd and baseless belief system I think it’d be fair to dismiss it anyway. It doesn’t matter how much fan fiction is written about Musaceae-ology. You don’t have to read it, you can safely ignore it.