• @LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    304 days ago

    Do not glorify Biden. Go back to Obama if you want an actual worthwhile role model. Biden was 110% on board with Bush in going to Iraq and spent the last 20 years of his career aggressively trying to break social security. Fuck boomer Biden.

    • @Kinperor@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I would say Obama is even worse than Biden as a role model to glorify.

      You can draw a direct line between Obama’s fellating of wall street and the rise to power of MAGA. He was elected on a mandate to punish the bankers and utterly failed at this task, he failed to enshrine Roe Vs Wade, and started a few wars. Combine this with other events like the management of Bernie Sanders’ first attempt at the presidency, and you have a spectacularly inept democrat party that lost all credibility/appeal with swing voters.

      Taking the current politics at face value, Trump would have 0 appeal if the democrats had a reasonable management of the border, if the democrats had actual economic politics instead of identity politics and didn’t bend the knee to the military industrial complex as much as republicans did.

        • @Kinperor@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 days ago
          • So…

            Afghanistan that Obama inherited from W., 2 wars in Iraq Obama inherited from W., training Syrian troops (who eventually did win) as a result of the Arab Spring and Assad gassing his own people which Obama did not start, and countering Yemen’s Houthi aggression which could really be argued that Obama did too little to counter as we are still dealing with it to this day with Iran aiding the Houthis…

            Iran has been a problem for the US since the Carter administration, can’t really say Obama started that one either

            Still unclear which if any of these conflicts Obama involved in

            Sometimes it is best to be on the right side of history by being involved in a military conflict.

            Being involved in a conflict does not automatically make it a bad thing

            • @Kinperor@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I don’t really feel like rehashing all the ways that the Iraq/Afghanistan war were disastrous

              training Syrian troops (who eventually did win) as a result of the Arab Spring and Assad gassing his own people which Obama did not start

              You need to read about Timber Sycamore. Assad did a lot of bad things, but it’s mental to imply that it was worth investing in Al-Qaeda affiliated militias to overthrow him. The new leader in Syria had a $10* million bounty on his head before rising to power in Syria, he is a leader of a splinter group of Al-Qaeda.

              The Assad overthrow is not the pure-wholesome western win that you think it is. Sectarian minorities have been ethnically cleansed by these Syrian rebels now in power.

              If you think that this is a success story from Obama’s admin, I’m afraid there’s no point discussing any longer.

              • Directions unclear

                Is it because the CIA was involved that you automatically assume it was bad or that Al-Qaeda is the same organization it was 25 years ago?

                • @Kinperor@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  44 days ago

                  25 years ago? The guy was wanted as a terrorist with a $10m bounty in 2017, the fuck you mean “25 years ago”. The bounty was rescinded because he overthrew a government seen as hostile by Israel and the US.

                  Are you just ignoring the article I linked describing mass killings of Alawite? Are you trying to defend those guys?

                  • The fuck I mean 25 years ago?

                    Gee, I dunno what happened about 25 years ago that could be historically relevant to this conversation /s

                    Yes, I am ignoring your articles

                    Of course I don’t condone the mass killing of alawites. I am also not Syrian and do not know why Assad loyalist groups killed 26 civilians and 121 police members of the Syrian General Security Service or why Syrian security forces and pro-government fighters in response perpetrated the killing of more than 700 Alawite civilians across parts of the Latakia countryside

                    I try not to question the absurdity of civil war, the answers are never satisfying

    • @ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 days ago

      At least he really pushed back against the ongoing genoci- oh wait, no, he did the opposite of that.

      • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 days ago

        He was the guy who knew what needed to be done decades beforehand and was ousted by the mechanations of the neocons. I wonder how much could be different if Reagan wasn’t able to make that deal with Iran to win the election.

    • @Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      23 days ago

      i once tried to go president by president in Wikipedia wondering how far I have to go before I find one president that didn’t commit war crimes.

      i gave up,