@return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 7 days agoThe plan for nationwide fiber internet might be upended for Starlinkwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down10
arrow-up1308arrow-down1external-linkThe plan for nationwide fiber internet might be upended for Starlinkwww.theverge.com@return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 7 days agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-square@dumbpotato@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-26 days agoRight. It’s way cheaper to connect cell towers than residences. There’s no way we’re going to be laying down fiber to reach all or even most US residences.
minus-square@calidris@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish14•6 days agoThing is, we already paid for connecting a majority residences. The corporations we paid just didn’t do it.
minus-square@NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish9•6 days agoThey weren’t just paid, they were paid repeatedly and they repeatedly didn’t do it.
minus-square@qjkxbmwvz@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglish6•6 days ago80% of the USA lives within urban areas (source). Urban “fiberization” is absolutely within reach. Agree that running fiber out to very remote areas is tricky, but even then it’s probably not prohibitive for all but the most remote locations.
Right. It’s way cheaper to connect cell towers than residences.
There’s no way we’re going to be laying down fiber to reach all or even most US residences.
Thing is, we already paid for connecting a majority residences. The corporations we paid just didn’t do it.
They weren’t just paid, they were paid repeatedly and they repeatedly didn’t do it.
80% of the USA lives within urban areas (source). Urban “fiberization” is absolutely within reach.
Agree that running fiber out to very remote areas is tricky, but even then it’s probably not prohibitive for all but the most remote locations.