I’m sorry but it doesn’t make sense TO ME. Based on what I was taught, regardless of the month, I think what matters first is to know what day of the month you are in, if at the beginning, in the middle or at the end of said month. After you know that, you can find out the month to know where you are in the year.

What is the benefit of doing it the other way around?

EDIT: To avoid misunderstandings:

  • I am NOT making fun OF ANYONE.
  • I am NOT negatively judging ANYTHING.
  • I am totally open to being corrected and LEARN.
  • This post is out of pure and honest CURIOSITY.

So PLEASE, don’t take it the wrong way.

  • @mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    123 days ago

    Most significant digits first. You write the thousands place before the hundreds, you write the month before the day. Of course, the whole argument is blow away when you write the year at the end instead of the beginning. (ISO YYYY-MM-DD dates for the win.)

    • @communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Most significant digits first.

      That would only make sense if the US wrote the year first, but they don’t. They just seem to slap the date together in a random order

      • @jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        23 days ago

        I think that’s context relevant though. If we think about when dates are most frequently used (news, business, planning) it’s typically within the year (or month will give context).

        That added with the fact it’s not uncommon in some situations to just provide month/day.

        That being said, I don’t think either is better or worse. Just a preference kinda thing, unlike the issue between metric and imperial units.

    • Anna
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      little Endian entered the chat.