• Joelk111
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        It’s free, and I see an official Github repository containing the code, is that not foss?

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 days ago

          Source code doesn’t make it foss

          Windows XP is open source by that definition

          • Joelk111
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 days ago

            By the acronym, opening up the source code to the public would make it open source. What is Grayjay missing to be open source then? Accepting contributions?

              • Joelk111
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I understand what you’re saying. What would make GrayJay open source? Allowing for community contribution?

                Edit: I looked it up thanks to your unhelpfullness, and open source seems to mean making the code available for the community to use, modify, and share, which Grayjay seems to do. I’m pretty sure I’m right here, but I do want to hear your definition and argument. Is your issue that the license doesn’t allow others to make money using the source code?

                • Possibly linux
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  Open source/libre/foss all have to do with the license. Grayjay doesn’t have a license that meets the criteria because it places arbitrary restrictions on the code.

                  It has nothing to do with contributions. You can ship the code on a CD and that is totally fine as long as it has the proper license.

    • mypasswordis1234OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 days ago

      but grayjay is only for media consumption. you cannot stream nor upload videos from it