Australia’s defence minister Richard Marles has called on China to explain why it needs to have “such an extraordinary military build-up”.

On Sunday morning, Marles asserted that “what we have seen from China is the single biggest increase in military capability and build up in conventional sense, by any country since the end of the Second World War”.

It is not just the size of the military build-up that concerns other countries, he told reporters.

“It’s the fact that it is happening without strategic reassurance. It’s happening without a clear strategic intent on the part of China… what we want to see is strategic transparency and strategic reassurance be provided by China, and an understanding of why it is needed to have such an extraordinary military build-up.”

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Why is there any mystery here. They said they intend on ending their civil war and have shown no indication whatsoever that such a statement is only rhetorical or posturing. Taiwan has never tried to be independent of China. It still claims sovereignty over all of China.

    If the US Confederates had retreated to Cuba and others had intervened on their behalf, while the Confederates still claimed dominion over a part of the USA, you can bet your ass the US would invade Cuba as soon as they had the opportunity. We can all decry the whole thing, but it is their conflict. If anything, we should be evacuating anyone and anything that needs to leave and capitulating without further involvement. Like if your neighbor and their spouse are arguing, stay out of it for the benefit of everyone. This is not some mate getting abused that needs help. This involves two bloody parties where all sides have done monstrous things and that needs to get resolved one way or another. Both can’t claim dominion over all. The past cannot be bowdlerized for convenience or exploitation for profit of western criminal capitalist abuse. No one needs to fight or die, but a resolution must be found.

    Edit: Wow Lemmy is remarkably stupid to the point of incompetent ineptitude at basic fundamental history. Like wtf am I doing here in a room with this insane nonsense.

    • cartoon meme dog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      Taiwan is independent of China, you’ve obviously never been there. They still have the old wartime territory definitions in their constitution because updating their constitution would provoke a violent response from China. Nobody, absolutely nobody, takes those claims seriously.

    • @Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 days ago

      Taiwan has never tried to be independent of China. It still claims sovereignty over all of China.

      Do you have a source for that?

      • cartoon meme dog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        they don’t, in any practical sense, and haven’t since Chiang died in the 80s, probably even before that.

        however, they are threatened with invasion if they ever update their constitution to reflect reality, because that would be taken as “declaring independence”.(even though they are completely independent anyway)

      • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆
        link
        fedilink
        English
        84 days ago

        This is common knowledge available anywhere.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Taiwan_(1945–present)

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Civil_War

        Those all have sources. There are also lots of reputable YouTubers with relevant academic credentials that have coved this, Asianometry and William C Fox are two that I recall covering the subject. I think Caspian Report did as well at one point in the last few years. This is like ultra basic surface level stuff everyone should know or severely question their sources and echo chambers if they are not made aware of this fundamental information.

        • @pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          94 days ago

          Expecting people to wade through 8000 word articles in the hope of finding mention of your claim is why you’re being downvoted.

          Imagine someone making the claim, ‘Jesus hated gay people, it’s obvious’ and then when probed for a source, responding, ‘this is common knowledge available anywhere:
          https://thekingsbible.com/

          • @CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Because that’s a history question. “Taiwan” is not a country, it’s a province of the Republic of China (ROC), which was the government of China before the communist revolution. They fled to Taiwan but their constitution etc still define them as the Republic Of China, with territorial claims over all of China

            Here is an article specifically on that exact topic

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Area

            Edit: The main “Taiwan” wikipedia article also has a map that can be selected under the label “Show map of Taiwan (dark green) with ROC Mainland Area and historical claims (light green)”

            • @pulsewidth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              83 days ago

              Many, many countries have ‘historical claims’ that mean nothing in current day geopolitics.

              Claiming that ‘Taiwan is not a country’ is enough for me to know that this will not be a fruitful discussion.

              Literally the first line of the ‘Taiwan’ Wikipedia article:

              Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC), is a country in East Asia.”

      • @eureka@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 days ago

        It’s complicated.

        Unfortunately, the Wikipedia articles I found lack citations, so they probably aren’t a good source. They claim that the ROC (Taiwan) claims all of the mainland.

        This reddit thread refers to the ROC constitution and interprets it as:

        In the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan area and the Mainland area, the following is stated:

        “Taiwan Area” refers to Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, and any other area under the effective control of the Government.

        “Mainland Area” refers to the territory of the Republic of China outside the Taiwan Area.

        “People of the Taiwan Area” refers to the people who have household registrations in the Taiwan Area.

        “People of the Mainland Area” refers to the people who have household registrations in the Mainland Area.

        The implication is that wherever this law applies, is what the ROC government considers to be “territory of the ROC outside of the Taiwan Area”. Currently the application of this law overlaps the entirety of the PRC, minus HK and Macau.


        This the fun part. If you look at the ROC constitution, it makes […] mention to Mongolia and Tibet.

        I don’t know how much of this applies beyond the KMT.

    • @SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      Except to actually make that a proper analogy, the confederacy would gave had to take over nearly all of the US, and the union would be in Cuba. In which case, yeah fuck those confederate bitches.

      Also at this point it doesn’t matter. Taiwan is more or less internationally recognized as an independent country so they can both sit the fuck down.