@icegladiator@lemy.lol to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 19 days agoProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lolimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up11.43Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.43Karrow-down1imageProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lol@icegladiator@lemy.lol to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 19 days agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-square@pemptago@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish54•19 days agoAlso, many proprietary softwares rely on open source libraries. So unless they catch, patch, and do not contribute those fixes, proprietary will be at least as vulnerable as the oss they depend on.
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish12•19 days agoIt always seems like it depends on really old libraries with major security flaws
minus-square@jj4211@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•18 days agoSorry, there’s no business case for rebasing those dependencies. Please focus story points on active marketing requirements instead.
Also, many proprietary softwares rely on open source libraries. So unless they catch, patch, and do not contribute those fixes, proprietary will be at least as vulnerable as the oss they depend on.
It always seems like it depends on really old libraries with major security flaws
Sorry, there’s no business case for rebasing those dependencies. Please focus story points on active marketing requirements instead.