Ukraine used ArduPilot to help it wipe out Russian targets. It wasn’t the first time and it won’t be the last.

Open source software used by hobbyist drones powered an attack that wiped out a third of Russia’s strategic long range bombers on Sunday afternoon, in one of the most daring and technically coordinated attacks in the war.

In broad daylight on Sunday, explosions rocked air bases in Belaya, Olenya, and Ivanovo in Russia, which are hundreds of miles from Ukraine. The Security Services of Ukraine’s (SBU) Operation Spider Web was a coordinated assault on Russian targets it claimed was more than a year in the making, which was carried out using a nearly 20-year-old piece of open source drone autopilot software called ArduPilot.

ArduPilot’s original creators were in awe of the attack. “That’s ArduPilot, launched from my basement 18 years ago. Crazy,” Chris Anderson said in a comment on LinkedIn below footage of the attack.

      • unalivejoy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        149 days ago

        When open source software has its use limited for war, it stops being open source.

        • trevor (he/they)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 days ago

          Eh. I don’t really care what the OSI a handful of tech giants in a trenchcoat have to say about the ethics of my licenses.

          If someone wants to allow modification, distribution, and usage of your software, in the spirit of open source, but don’t want it to be used by organizations that bomb children, I’d consider that better than an Open Source™️ license.

          • @Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            48 days ago

            Yeah, i don’t think any military will care about what restrictions you put in your license anyway. What are you going to do about it? Sue them?

              • @Saleh@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                18 days ago

                If you create a technology and make it publicly available you need to consider the possible uses and misuses. Misusers wont be held back by a license limitation. That is a simple fact of life.

                • trevor (he/they)
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  Adopting that attitude toward anything is pretty self-defeating. It’s the same bad argument used against gun regulations in the US: “only misusers will have guns”.

                  Whether you agree with more or less regulations on anything, the “misusers will just do it anyway” is a bad argument.

          • @grue@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            39 days ago

            The FSF is very much the opposite of “a handful of tech giants in a trenchcoat,” yet they take the same position.

    • @exussum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      169 days ago

      You can say this about any change, or innovation - vaccines, democracy, the Internet, psychology.

      If you want to push it completely into a political only view, why should we not become an isolationist nation, which steals but never contributes back?

      • @Vegasvator@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 days ago

        The post I replied to stated it was a project they could support on an article about how it was used as a weapon against Russia. I believe it’s use as a weapon on Russia is why they support it. I asked them a simple question to invoke them to think, but then you chimed about all technology and even vaccines. And then talking about becoming an isolationist nation? What are you even talking about?

        • @exussum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Asking people to think by riding the line of just asking a question is pretty lame. If you want people to think, don’t bury that. The method you employ is the same disingenuous tactic to defend the other side.

          What if the Russians did the same? They didn’t and it’s not on the table. They’ve already made up a war and prolonged for multiple years in an attempt to kill off and reclaim Ukraine

            • @exussum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              119 days ago

              That’s the thing. I’m not replying to you specifically. I don’t think you’re going to change. Chances are most people like you don’t.

              I’m replying to educate all of the onlookers. What this guy did sucks and here’s why. And this is what you do about it.

    • HellsBelle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 days ago

      Even when the other side uses it?

      Sure, if they promise to just blow up empty planes sitting a tarmac.

      Guaranteed Russia doesn’t go for it tho.