@icegladiator@lemy.lol to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 19 days agoProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lolimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up11.43Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.43Karrow-down1imageProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lol@icegladiator@lemy.lol to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 19 days agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-square@BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink1•18 days agoAs a non-native English speaker, I’ve assumed it meant that companies can put anything they want in their contracts
minus-square@tfm@europe.publinkfedilink5•18 days agoNo it’s basically that companies can put money into politics.
minus-square@brendansimms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•18 days agoThere was a court case called the ‘Citizens United v FEC’ that ended up ruling in favor of corporations; It said corporations and organizations and unions can ‘donate’ as much money as they want to political candidates i.e. legalized bribery.
As a non-native English speaker, I’ve assumed it meant that companies can put anything they want in their contracts
No it’s basically that companies can put money into politics.
There was a court case called the ‘Citizens United v FEC’ that ended up ruling in favor of corporations; It said corporations and organizations and unions can ‘donate’ as much money as they want to political candidates i.e. legalized bribery.