• Ephera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 days ago

    Yeah, really unfortunate that that’s not possible. Always having to take a screenshot and then type out letter by letter what’s on the screenshot, that can be quite annoying.

    But even if copying text was possible, the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content, so that it’s clear that they don’t necessarily hold the exact same opinion or that they might not have all the knowledge to defend the statements in the post.

    Cross-posting could fill that same roll without screenshotting text.

    • who
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      the reason people post pictures of text is to give proper attribution, but also to distance themselves from the content,

      If only we had some way to reference an original source. Something like a figurative link, if you will.

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 days ago

        That would be cool, but human brains are weirdos. If you’re already copying text, you could’ve edited or annotated it, for example. For example, if it’s an opinion you don’t entirely agree with, you might feel obliged to say so, because you have the ability to do so when it’s a text post.

        If you want to call that irrational, I’m not arguing against that. I’m just saying it’s the reality we live in and I’d like to have tooling to deal with that better, because I would also prefer text to not be screenshotted.

        • who
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          human brains are weirdos.

          Truer words were never said. :)