• @jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Telltales: floor too shiny, machines on the sides dont make sense, inconsistencies in piping in the ceiling, random floating bits on the top right, a few big shadows that dont match the windows instead of many smaller ones

      • @GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        312 days ago

        The spacing on the lights up top is super weird. AI seems to have a real problem recreating consistent repeated patterns.

      • Ziglin (it/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 days ago

        Wonky floor hole shape is what made me certain, didn’t look too close at first and thought it was photoshopped.

      • @RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        30
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        That’s how they make paper and a lot of other flat goods like tape. The manufacturer makes these gigantic rolls then there’s this entire industry called converting where a company, a converter, takes it and process it down into a finished product. They may add adhesives, lamination or printing to it during the process.

        You can go to a store and buy 3M tape but 3M doesn’t actually make it like that. They make a 12ft wide, 10,000 ft roll that someone buys and forklifts into a machine that cuts it into a bunch of smaller rolls that you can buy

        • @Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1213 days ago

          Those machines are referred to as slitters. I designed and built 2 for 3M Abrasive division back in the 1990’s. Talk about a process that involves less than reliable hardware, (I never met an air bar or pneumatic web sensor I didn’t hate), and enough wishful thinking to achieve the speeds 3M wanted them to run at that would make an Alchemist proud. I was constantly amazed that my designs even worked at all.

      • @JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Edit: it is AI generated, completely missed the genAI tag on the Adobe Stock website, and [4] is not a ton like I thought, it’s 307kg

        It’s listed on Adobe Stock photos[1]

        I did find other similar photos[2][3] so it looks like it’s an actual thing that exists. Actually found a listing for a 1 metric ton roll of it[4].

        [1] https://stock.adobe.com/fr/images/large-rolls-of-paper-at-a-paper-and-cardboard-production-plant-finished-products-rolls-of-paper-for-further-processing/689500501

        [2] https://www.dreamstime.com/large-rolls-paper-cardboard-production-plant-finished-products-further-processing-image299294779

        [3] https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/large-paper-rolls.html

        [4] https://m.kraftpaper-rolls.com/sale-11507857-100gsm-environment-friendly-natural-brown-kraft-paper-jumbo-roll-for-making-bag.html

          • @SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            312 days ago

            Holy shit. Ok I’m gonna make an ai to feed generated prompts into a generative AI, let it run for a week and sell the mountain of slop as stock photos.

        • OfCourseNot
          link
          fedilink
          713 days ago

          [2] is ai generated or so it says. [4] is real but not as big, and not quite a ton, it says ‘307kg’.

      • OfCourseNot
        link
        fedilink
        613 days ago

        Most certainly ai generated, many things in the picture don’t make much sense when looked at in detail. First of all, who would leave that absolute unit of a roll in the middle of the factory? With an axle inside?

        • AwesomeLowlander
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          As you’ve been proven wrong, this is a good time to point out that accuracy rates of humans identifying AI pics is ~50%, or no better than guesswork. Keep that in mind the next time you declare something AI. YOU might be the reason an artist quits their passion, not AI

          Edit: Since I see how my statement might be misconstrued. I’m aware this particular pic is AI gen. I’m referring to OP’s statement about the axle being nonsense, which somebody else showed is standard practice. And that doesn’t really take away from my main point.

            • AwesomeLowlander
              link
              fedilink
              English
              113 days ago

              I was referring to OP’s statement about the axle, which somebody else pointed out is standard practice.

              • @Klear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                213 days ago

                I’m not buying that given the second half of your comment. You’re just trying to weasel out instead of apoloigising.

                • AwesomeLowlander
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  113 days ago

                  The freaking discussion showing the source and that it’s AI predates my comment by over an hour. You can attribute whatever you like to my statement, I’ve clarified my meaning and if you’ve never written a comment and had it come out sounding like you meant something else, good for you.

          • OfCourseNot
            link
            fedilink
            213 days ago

            How have I been proven wrong? The other commenter posted a (real) picture of a similar thing, that proves that these exist (which I haven’t put into question), not that the other picture is not ai generated. They even said that some detail bugs them, so no one has ‘proven’ the first image is a real photograph.

            On the other hand, the poster of that link didn’t say they’re quitting art, just not posting it online. But even if that were the case, receiving (even unjust) criticism is part of being an artist.

            • AwesomeLowlander
              link
              fedilink
              English
              113 days ago

              Not sure if you saw my edit before replying. I’m just referring to your statement about the axle. I’m aware the pic itself is AI gen.

              receiving (even unjust) criticism is part of being an artist.

              What kind of logic is that? So let’s just contribute to make things worse for them?

              • OfCourseNot
                link
                fedilink
                213 days ago

                No I didn’t, and like the other commenter I don’t buy it either. My comment didn’t say you don’t put the axle into the roll, that’s very common for machines that are roll-fed. My comment said you don’t leave it laying around in the middle of a factory. Even with much smaller machines, eg a receipt printer, where you put the axle into the roll before installing it into the machine the axle is part of the machine and usually there’s only one. You pull it out of the depleted one as you take it out from the machine, put it in the new roll, and install that roll on the machine.

      • @trd@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        413 days ago

        Called a Tambur, usally between 15-25 tonns. Reason not bigger / heavier is that then it starts to damage “crushes” it self.