Stamets to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works • 4 days agoToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up11.32Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldStamets to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works • 4 days agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 linkfedilinkEnglish21•edit-23 days agoYeah but I’m not into inanimate objects. My rules are: It has to be alive It has to give consent Although if a vampire showed up and consented to sex, I might bend rule 1.
minus-square@lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink10•3 days agoReally, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 linkfedilinkEnglish9•3 days agoIt’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
minus-square@lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink7•3 days agoEh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
minus-squareGloomylinkfedilink4•edit-22 days agoThe Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
deleted by creator
Yeah but I’m not into inanimate objects.
My rules are:
It has to be alive
It has to give consent
Although if a vampire showed up and consented to sex, I might bend rule 1.
Really, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
It’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
Eh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
The Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Tell that to a dildo
Yours can talk?
…yours can’t?