• @Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      53 days ago

      In theory Java is very similar to C#, an IL based JIT runtime with a GC, of course. So where is the difference coming from between the two? How is it better than pascal, a complied language? These are the questions I’m wondering about.

    • esa
      link
      fedilink
      43 days ago

      And it powers a lot of phones. People generally don’t like it when their phone needs to charge all the freaking time.

      • @HelloRoot@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I ran Linux with KDE on my phone for a while and it for sure needed EVEN MORE charging all the time even though most of the system is C, with a sprinkle of C++ and QT.

        But that is probably due to other inefficiencies and lack of optimization (which is fine, make it work first, optimize later)

        • esa
          link
          fedilink
          43 days ago

          Yeah, and Android has had some 16 years of “optimize later”. I have some very very limited experience with writing mobile apps and while I found it to be a PITA, there is clearly a lot of thought given to how to not eat all the battery and die in the ecosystem there. I would expect that kind of work to also be done at the JVM level.

          If Windows Mobile had succeeded, C# likely would’ve been lower as well, just because there’d be more incentive to make a battery charge last longer.

      • @HelloRoot@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I’m using the fattest of java (Kotlin) on the fattest of frameworks (Spring boot) and it is still decently fast on a 5 year old raspberry pi. I can hit precise 50 μs timings with it.

        Imagine doing it in fat python (as opposed to micropython) like all the hip kids.