I am pretty sure the kind of AIs that generally help with accessibility are not the same as an LLM or other generative type AIs. They’re statistical models and shit like that, and have existed much longer.
This is the problem of using an already not-quite-true term (AI) for several wildly different things.
Hell, not at all true. Nothing we currently have is intelligent, they are all complex statistical models that are described using misleading terms in the interest in getting the public to believe they are more capable than they are. Reasoning, learning, & hallucinations are all hyped up to make them sound intentional instead of statistical.
I am pretty sure the kind of AIs that generally help with accessibility are not the same as an LLM or other generative type AIs. They’re statistical models and shit like that, and have existed much longer.
This is the problem of using an already not-quite-true term (AI) for several wildly different things.
Hell, not at all true. Nothing we currently have is intelligent, they are all complex statistical models that are described using misleading terms in the interest in getting the public to believe they are more capable than they are. Reasoning, learning, & hallucinations are all hyped up to make them sound intentional instead of statistical.
To be perfectly fair: the “artificial” part is true. 😌
Artificial requires intelligence to be true to have any meaning. Yeah, take that!
(Also you were right to point that out.)