• Avid AmoebaOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Yes, and the workers risk nothing, or something like that, I’m told. 😂

    • rigatti
      link
      fedilink
      English
      523 hours ago

      I get the sentiment and I’m all for workers sharing in profits, but what do they really risk by working at a company? Sure, the company can fail and they might be stuck in a bad situation, but shareholders and owners probably have it worse in that scenario, right?

        • rigatti
          link
          fedilink
          English
          214 hours ago

          They don’t lose their life if a company goes under though? I don’t mean to diminish the contribution of workers. I think they need a much higher share of what companies take in, and they need more voices at their companies.

      • @pebbles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Depends, are you considering the fact that 90% of stocks are owned by the top 10% of Americans? Also are you considering that being in the top 10% means you likely have rich friends and family that could bail you out? I think black rock is going to be fine.

        Most businesses aren’t like my friends parents little Chinese restraunt.

        To me using the, “think of the shareholders” line is silly for a reason. The biggest privilege is the privilege to make mistakes without becoming impoverished. Workers have it much harder in that respect.

        Edit: grammer

        • rigatti
          link
          fedilink
          English
          214 hours ago

          You make a good point that the shareholder/business owner class is more likely to have better safety nets. So from that standpoint, if the absolute value of their loss is greater, it could have a much less significant impact on their lives.

          I think you may be underestimating the amount of small businesses though, at least in the US.