SSUPII to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • edit-222 days agofree thinkingsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1784arrow-down10
arrow-up1784arrow-down1imagefree thinkingsopuli.xyzSSUPII to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • edit-222 days agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-square@Crashumbc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish31•22 days ago120 is the minimum for above average. I wouldn’t consider it “high”. (Not ragging just being honest, I’m also in the 120’s)
minus-square@Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink3•20 days agoWell the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq. While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don’t know why you don’t want to consider top 9% as “high”. What is high in your opinion?
120 is the minimum for above average. I wouldn’t consider it “high”. (Not ragging just being honest, I’m also in the 120’s)
Well the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq.
While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don’t know why you don’t want to consider top 9% as “high”.
What is high in your opinion?