Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel’s right to defend itself.

“Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to “remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.”

  • @wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ukraine gave up their nukes, look what happened to them. Libya gave their nuclear weapons program up, and look at them today. North Korea didn’t, and they’re still standing, for better or for worse. Iraq was accused of having nukes, but didn’t have them, and got destroyed. Seems that if you want any semblance of sovereignty outside of NATO, you better have some nukes.

    So for any nations reading along I’ll summarize the basic conclusions:

    1. Get nukes
    2. If you have nukes, do not give them up
    3. If you’re accused of having nukes, drop everything and get nukes asap

    Do you think Israel would be bombing Iran if they had nukes?

    • @REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 day ago

      Are you claiming that the world would be a safer place with every other unstable or authoritarian country having nukes?

      • @NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 day ago

        He didn’t say the world would be safer. But history kind of shows it is in each countries self interest to have nukes vs not having them.

      • @mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 day ago

        MAD safer no, but essentially disabling conventional warfare as a practical idea yes.

        India and Pakistan are armed to the teeth, yet they haven’t fought a real war ever since they both got nukes.

        • @REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          What makes you assume said countries would not act exactly like Russia towards others without nukes?

              • @Leet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 day ago

                There’s Afghanistan, Iraq, and these days there’s talk about a 51st state, rumblings about Greenland, Palestine

                American aggression and coups in various countries… there’s so many examples going back to Vietnam and maybe before.

                Basically after the British cocked up so many countries in the world, it passed the baton to America.

                Iran is one example of a country whose problems are directly caused by American interventionism.

                • @REDACTED@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  You wrote all that and failed to give me one example of annexation by US. Israel is annexing Palestine. Russia is annexing Ukraine. US didn’t annex Afghanistan or other countries. The states/countries live on, sometimes better than before. There is a huge difference.

                  I honestly believe trump is BS’ing about annexing Canada.

                  • Berserker
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 day ago

                    You don’t have to annex countries nowadays to make them your colonies. You just let your companies take all the business there, exploiting the resources etc, you install a few military bases to serve your geopolitcal interests, aka war games, and just for show you let them elect your lackeys as local representatives of the empire. The american empire is the largest one in the world currently, even without techincally owning all that land. There is no need to, it’s the 21st century. Power is not measured only by land.

                  • @Leet@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 day ago

                    Oh no, I didn’t. I gave you examples of the USA doing much worse things. I also replied to your comment about Russias behavior to other countries, of which only 1 they had attacked. How many did America attack?

                    In any case the USA would have stayed much longer if in their occupation of the Middle East if public pressure, suicide rate of their forces etc.

        • @REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          Why? Give it some thought and actually come up with a logical answer, because countries do not invade US because of nukes, but because they have the most advanced army in the world. Nukes for US changes nothing, they’re there only as an answer to other nukes.