• @WR5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 day ago

    There is a calendar on the site showing which days he was confirmed to have been golfing. There are many on the weekends, but not all, which means “work week” time was spent golfing.

    • @JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 day ago

      Eight days so far during ‘work week’ time. If he was going on his own dime, this wouldn’t be worth talking about.

      It just makes a better talking point to say ‘he’s golfed 37 days out of 152’ despite it not being about how he’s using his weekends (assuming we hold government to the same 5 on 2 off standard as most of us have) when it’s really about how much it’s costing.

      A better headline would be ‘President spends income tax of 20,000 Americans on personal entertainment’.

      • @WR5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        Agreed, but the person I’m responding to made a point about weeks vs. weekends.

        • @JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          323 hours ago

          Yes I suppose, just like anything, a nuance here would be whether or not we expect a person of such political authority to be able to have weekends at all.

          On one hand, they’re still a person working a job and no one should be working 365 days a year On the other, the societal cost, in terms of income tax covering travel and security costs, of having a President that travels every weekend is a bit much.

          If the President was only golfing on the weekends, and wasn’t charging the government to golf at his own clubs, then this whole thing of him taking leisure every weekend would be a harder thing to argue against without getting into that whole administration work life balance discussion.