• @N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 days ago

    The rich have too much by definition, but billionaires in America have an historically obscene amount of wealth. Wealth inequality in today’s America has surpassed pre-Revolution France.

      • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        21 day ago

        It is a zero sum game. The rich are addicted to power over others despite data showing that even they would be happier in a more equitable society (see TED talk by Richard Wilkinson called “Spirit Level”).

        • @iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It’s not a zero sum game. If someone is unemployed, they become employed and create some goods or services, they both can spend more money and the business can sell it for more money than they pay out as salary

          So you have created wealth that didn’t exist before. It is possible for everyone to be rich, provided we automate enough tasks that nobody is wasting time on menial labor

          • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            112 hours ago

            The money supply is fixed. Government prints money but not to cover new jobs. It is all about transfer of wealth.

            We could all be moderately wealthy if Billionaires were not a thing. Basic Income is perhaps feasible too.

            Economist Gary Stevenson explains it well. He has over a million views of each video on YouTube.

            He is working class as fuck but graduated from LSE & Oxford and then made millions since 2008 betting that inequality will rise and that most people will be worse off. He was the most successful trader for Citibank but quit in disgust and to reveal the scam to the public. Now with a best-selling book.

            https://youtu.be/BRvMuefnl0k

            • @iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              110 hours ago

              The government lowers interest rates to increase economic growth and when the inflation is low. Lending increases the money supply because banks are not required to have full reserves. So yes, the Fed actually increases the effective money supply at the correct rate depending on whether they want the economy to grow or to control inflation

              • @sqgl@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                The supply in circulation. Bonds are promissory notes. I don’t think the money disappears from ledgers.

                The fractional reserve is fixed AFAIK.