• @TDCN@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    2319 hours ago

    I think the ratng is too forgiving with not much room for improvement. A lot of phones are already class B og A so no incentive to innovate and improve or we are going to end up with nonsensical A++++ ratings.

    • @Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      3418 hours ago

      This happened with appliances. They ended up with the silly A++++ ratings added in 2010 as otherwise everything would be an A.

      In 2021 they decided to redefine grades instead. A fridge at A+++ became a C. A became the top grade again.

      It’s also worth noting that as they push the whole scale and G into being more efficient that essentially bans products that can’t achieve a rating.

      if everything becomes an A the system has worked and increased the efficiency across the market. They’ll adjust the goals every 5 to 10 years.

      The EU battery life measure is going to be the most interesting battle ground in my opinion. “All day battery life” will have a measured metric in hours.

      If the EU have managed to make that metric representative of an amount of screen time in a busy day it could become the first thing consumers look at. Or at least a deal breaker when that number is too low.

      • @ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        515 hours ago

        Thing is, battery drain in a good cell coverage are while on wifi is significantly lower than using cell data with no wifi in a poorly covered area.

        • @wewbull@feddit.uk
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          516 hours ago

          Blame the education system. They ingrained the concept of A being the best in all of us.

          • LousyCornMuffins
            link
            fedilink
            English
            313 hours ago

            i have a weird concept. give each phone a tortilla chip for each positive rating. the final score is the size of the pile of nachos the phone has.