a camera should save the raw data from the sensor to a file along with potentially metadata, there is no reason for it to “enhance” the photo or video, compression only makes sense for posting online or video
Tell that you every single digital camera. Very few output RAW by default, many don’t even offer that option. This isn’t a “phone cameras” issue.
The fact that you think post process is compression says a lot, or that there’s no reason to apply post process when 99.9% of the population don’t even know what RAW is and won’t benefit from it.
Again, you want a proper camera, buy a proper camera. But learn a bit before
I want my photos to be grainy, with natural lens distortion, instead of current trend of pictures being shouty to look good on social media
You can shoot RAW on your phone today.
Only with primary lens
I think you need a camera, not a phone
I don’t need one, thanks
Oh, keep complaining then.
Maybe phones shouldn’t have multiple cameras if they aren’t actually usable
Maybe you shouldn’t buy a phone if you want a “usable” camera.
And you shouldn’t buy a camera either as you don’t seem to understand those either.
a camera should save the raw data from the sensor to a file along with potentially metadata, there is no reason for it to “enhance” the photo or video, compression only makes sense for posting online or video
Tell that you every single digital camera. Very few output RAW by default, many don’t even offer that option. This isn’t a “phone cameras” issue.
The fact that you think post process is compression says a lot, or that there’s no reason to apply post process when 99.9% of the population don’t even know what RAW is and won’t benefit from it.
Again, you want a proper camera, buy a proper camera. But learn a bit before