@IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 days ago[Video] BBC cuts away during pro-Palestine musicians Kneecap. The followup act Bob Vylan invents a new chant on live TVi.imgur.commessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1654arrow-down10
arrow-up1654arrow-down1play[Video] BBC cuts away during pro-Palestine musicians Kneecap. The followup act Bob Vylan invents a new chant on live TVi.imgur.com@IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 days agomessage-square131fedilink
minus-square@entwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish12•5 days agoIf your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.
minus-square@floo@retrolemmy.comlinkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-25 days agoProve it if you can. Try not to suck Nazi cock on your way to that, though. Well, then you’re welcome to prove that. I await your evidence to support your assertion. I’ll warn you ahead of time: arguing against facts usually ends poorly. Beware. I’m gonna sleep great tonight because I didn’t defend Nazi IDF soldiers.
minus-square@entwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish7•5 days agoNah, I’m not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.
minus-square@njm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•5 days agoGoing through these comments you’ve not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You’re basically going on vibes.
minus-square@entwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish2•5 days agoI’ve only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn’t be arguing with someone who didn’t understand the core concepts of the conversation. The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.
minus-square@njm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•5 days agoConsidering this is the first time you’ve responded to me at all I think maybe I don’t trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.
If your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.
Prove it if you can. Try not to suck Nazi cock on your way to that, though.
Well, then you’re welcome to prove that. I await your evidence to support your assertion.
I’ll warn you ahead of time: arguing against facts usually ends poorly. Beware.
I’m gonna sleep great tonight because I didn’t defend Nazi IDF soldiers.
Nah, I’m not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.
Going through these comments you’ve not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You’re basically going on vibes.
I’ve only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn’t be arguing with someone who didn’t understand the core concepts of the conversation.
The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.
Considering this is the first time you’ve responded to me at all I think maybe I don’t trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.