Most people still haven’t heard of Manifest V3, so if you are one of those not using Firefox, this is for you.


If you’ve been on YouTube or Reddit August last year, you might’ve seen this screen yourself, or a screenshot of someone else getting it. This of course, I am talking about the infamous YouTube ad blocker blocker popup, discussion exploded on Reddit mostly consisting of people complaining about ads, as well as an angry mob storming r/memes, turning it into a Firefox propaganda centre.

About a month later, different adblockrs eventually found their way of bypassing detection, and they work on YouTube again. So natrually Redditors thought they’ve won another war against big tech, completely ignoring Google’s original plan to kill off adblockers by June this year.

So all extensions, including adblockers follows a specification called the Manifest V2. The Manifest allows extensions to do certain things, say accessing browser tabs or to change browser settings. All while putting some limitations, and prevent extensions from doing crazy stuff like installing a virus to your system. But too much limitation, is what pisses off many extension developers about the upcoming ManifestV3.

In this article written by the EFF, they interviewed developers responsible for popular extensions, where most described ManifestV3 as a downgrade, with some accused it for being purposefully bad. I particularly like this one from the creator of SingleFile, “I consider the migration to Manifest V3 to be a major regression from a functional and technical point of view.”

After an update in June this year, a feature called the WebRequest API will be removed, and the adblockers and tracker blockers that depend on this feature will stop working. Since the business model of Google is to track your online activity and then show you personalised ads, it is not difficult to see why this feature is removed.

Not only are they sacrifising user experience for monetary gain, they are forcing the same update on all Chromium browsers as well. I am hereby devastated to inform you that this is not the first time they have done it, and it will not be the last time they will do it.

But there are also good news, non-Chromium browsers will not be affected by the Manifest V3, and if you are already using one, you will be exempt from any future nonsense Google throws in your way. So if you are considering switching to one, unless Safari is your goto browser, which lacks competent extensions support, you can still get your adblockers, another adblockers, all the adblockers.

So are you going to make the switch before the update? Let me know in the comments down below, anyways I will be seeing you in two weeks, have a good one.


An article for more my ranting needs https://gmtex.siri.sh/fs/1/School/Y12/Cssoc/chromium.html

  • @infeeeee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    991 year ago

    Very useful video. I miss that you don’t list the Chromium browsers. A lot of people, the target audience of this video don’t know that edge, opera, vivaldi, brave are all affected some way.

    • @siriusmart@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      221 year ago

      well, it’s a video making decision. most people these days have virtually negative attention span, and they would click off the video given the slightest chance, and listing Chromium browsers would be too much time for too little argument made.

      I’ve accepted that I’m not mental outlaw and people wouldn’t be tuning in for a podcast, so the best I could do is the minesweep the video and remove any opportunities, because if I don’t do that, most people won’t get past the first 10 seconds, “getting straight to the point” is one of the things I’ve learnt while doing youtube

      • @siriusmart@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        261 year ago

        also, infographics are great for these explainers video, because i could jam pack so much more information that is otherwise impossible, and in 1:53 I’ve referenced “all chromium browsers” with all their logo on screen, which is insanely efficient because with this visual style of story telling I could brought up two points at the same time:

        • chromium browsers are affected
        • these browsers on screen are chromium browsers
      • @siriusmart@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        yeah but its not the same, sure you could mod your router or use a pihole to get adblocking, but it is not the same convenience as extensions, and by far ublock origin is the best adblocker no arguments raised.

        moreover companies can’t really do much when they are completely reliant on chromium, and they can’t do much except pulling PR stunts and try to sound like they are doing something while all they’re doing is to merge commits from upstream chromium once in a while

        one example is the “we will continue to support v2” stunt by brave, which is not possible as they have 0 experience maintaining a browser, also vivaldi is absolutely proprietary

  • The Menemen
    link
    fedilink
    901 year ago

    I am on Firefox since I think 2003. Never understood why anyone would use a non-free browser, even if it sometimes works faster. People are weird.

    • @Skepticpunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      481 year ago

      Chrome had a bigger ad budget and had a good amount of hype when it was released, since Google was still well-regarded when it was released.

      • nelson
        link
        fedilink
        471 year ago

        Firefox also had a period where it was slow AF. I switched to chrome at that point which was a lot faster.

        I’ve ( happily ) been on Firefox these past few years though. Firefox addons on mobile devices is a blessing too.

        I enjoyed vivaldi as well before I went back to Firefox. Too bad it’s chromium based :(.

    • @S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      I am one of those “Opera back in thr day” guys so you know the story. I eventually gotten back to use Mozilla Firefox. Chrome had it’s good days but it’s a pionner of the enshitification.

    • @RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Same here, even my newly issued work PC always gets the Firefox treatment. Annoyingly, some sites that I need for work (almost, but not quite, zero) just do not work with Firefox, but do with chrome.

      • The Menemen
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        At my work PC they blocked all, but chrome… And I really don’t think Chrome is superior to Firefox at this point of time.

        • They sort of tried at my last job… There’s portable, non admin installs of Firefox available. The tricky part was ssl inspection certificates, but even that is easier than it used to be.

  • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    421 year ago

    Already moved to Firefox on my phone. The only browser on mobile that I know of that supports extensions, giving me ad-free youtube and dark mode on websites ever since vanced was shut down.

      • @schema@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I tried revanced for a while. It worked for a little and one day videos were suddenly buffering for 5 minutes at a time after around a minute of playing. I read online that it might have been yt measures against using a client like this (changing account or logging out didnt do anything. Browser played the videos fine)

        Firefox with adblocker and the extension to be able to play in the background has been my savior. Works flawlessly.

        • @cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Every other month, YT update something that break Revanced.

          So I just went to the Revanced app to see what’s the newest recommended version of YT to download and patch. Then a quick reinstall and everything is back to normal. Don’t even have to re-login.

          Been doing that for over a year. Imo, the native app’s experience is always a thousand times better than the mobile web browser.

        • @PhAzE@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It was, and it was after 30 seconds. You install the updated revanced, and turn on app version spoofing in the settings and no more buffer issue.

      • Brahvim Bhaktvatsal
        link
        fedilink
        isiZulu
        110 months ago

        I personally enjoy connecting to Invidious via Clipious. On my Debian laptop, I use FreeTube for the same, although I think a web-hosted frontend for Invidious directly loads videos way faster.

      • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        My phone uses a split APK which requires root using revanced, but my work profile blocks rooting ;_;

        I could just download the APKs manually but a lot more effort than using Firefox ngl

        • @cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Revanced doesn’t require root. You download the Revanced app from official site then open it and choose YouTube. It’ll tell you what’s the latest recommended version of YT to use. You download that exact version from APKpure. Use Revanced to patch the YT app (I just use default) and install. That’s it. No root.

          Also it requires their new Revanced Gapps package if you want to login to YT (it’ll ask and point you to download link if you don’t have it)

  • UltraMagnus0001
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    I’m gonna be cocky and sit on my high horse to say I switched back to Firefox many years ago when they got rid of the memory leaks

    • @gjoel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Firefox - Accidentally introduces memory leaks. People flee in droves.

      Chrome - Intentionally introduces privacy leaks. People go “eh” end keep using it.

      Gotta protect that memory!

    • @odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I switched off of Firefox because of those memory leaks. I remeber when it hit the tech news circles when the community contributer that was frustrated with them went in and fixed two of the biggest culprits.

      Then I just didn’t bother til somewhat recently. For the most part, it’s great and does what ilI want/need. Biggest complaint is that some UX overhauls are needed for Mobile FX, especially around tab management.

      • KptnAutismus
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        yeah, on android it’s kind of a pain. but being able to use extensions is insanely good.

    • @banazir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      The last time I remember Firefox having serious memory leaks they called it Firebird. Guess I’ve been lucky. Or in a comfortable ignorant haze.

      • @odelik@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Firefox had some major memory leaks when Chrome first launched (2008). It became noticeable with the more tabs you had and the longer the browser was opened. This was also during the days for consumer systems with 16GB max RAM & 32GB on higher end enthusiast systems.

        We also have to remeber that this was 10 years before Google removed their “Don’t be Evil” motto, and there was still a great deal of trust that had been earned by tech professionals.

        So when Chrome came in, had a minimalist UI (for the time) and was light weight and memory light without any obvious memory leaks, it was a performance boost for a toooon of users.

        Chrome has since become a memory hog and is now being developed and pushed by a company that has become heavily enshittified & evil. Firefox has become lightweight, memory efficient, and is an FOSS product that’s not evil and enshittified making it the right choice in 2024, but is going to be an uphill battle that hopefully more tech professionals move to as Manifest V3 becomes a reality.

      • @nix@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It had a leak a few years back. Not a huge one, but it’d add up on devices that had a ton of tabs or were always on.

  • cooljacob204
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    I already switched to Firefox a while back. The new tracking system bullshit was the last straw. Chrome team is too busy trying to invasively track us rather then actually improving the browser for consumers.

    • @siriusmart@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      well a bit more on that, since i record my audio an audacity, there are 3 types of noise suppression i could do

      • the first one of course is no noise suppression at all
      • then there is the standard noise suppression
      • and then there is the new RNNoise suppression

      RNNoise is the best at removing noise, but it also cuts off all the deeper parts of my voice (i think, because I have no way of knowing how I really sound like), so here its a tradeoff between getting the entirety of my voice, or absolute silence, here i chose my voice

  • nickm8
    link
    fedilink
    241 year ago

    TLDR: Google’s Manifest V3 will stop many ad blockers from working on Chromium browsers. This is to increase ad revenue. Non-Chromium browsers like Firefox won’t be affected.

  • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    It’s a good thing I’m a Firefox boy. I’m honestly fucking sick of companies making free money off me at my inconvenience while I get nothing in return.

  • Left for Firefox when they announced this update. I still have to use Chrome when I work in Google drive since basic functions like copy/paste don’t work in non-chrome browsers, but even without this update the minute+ time it takes for chrome to open reminds me I made the right decision.

    • @macattack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Same. It was definitely an adjustment as a former ChromeOS user. There were some minor issues like getting playback for streaming services and maybe 1-2% of the unique websites I visit not being built properly for Firefox but it’s pretty infrequent and you develop a quick workflow to resolve the issues. I have a backup version of Chromium that I use as an emergency browser.

      I use a Firefox fork (Floorp) which gives me PWAs capabilities which was the last hurdle for me.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I keep Cromite (on Android) and Chromium (pc) around for those sites that are so poorly coded I have to use a chrome-engined browser.

      It’s really annoying.

      At least those 2 browsers are fast (and I keep history turned off because I only use them for crappy websites).