• Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1451 year ago

    Not to worry! Li’l Kim’s Bestest Buddy and Honorary Number One Chief Saluter will be ready to help NK help Russia destroy Ukraine and NATO.

    All you MAGA service “losers” and “suckers” got quite the cognitive dissonance jam rockin’ huh.

    • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Biden broke all ties with North Korea after Trump. Reverting to the old demand to denuclearize before for any negotiations and imposing more sanctions.

      As we have learned from Ukraine. no sane country should ever give up their nukes because they become a prime target for invasion. If Ukraine still had nukes Russia would never have invaded.

      Biden has also imposed sanctions on NK which were undone by Trump

      Now I’m not a an NK fan but I’m not sure why people think pushing NK away would make them more friendly. Unlike the past where American sanctions spelled doom and America could bend any country to their will, China and Russia are now picking up the countries America pushes away.

      • @zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        China and Russia are now picking up the countries America pushes away.

        Pretty sure North Korea has been allied with China and Russia for way longer than the US has been “pushing them away”.

        • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well yes because America had been pushing North Korea away.

          Trump tried to lay contact with NK. He might not have had pure motives for it. He usually doesn’t. But the action itself is not the problem.

          Biden hitting NK with the “new number who dis” right after becoming president certainly doesn’t make them trust us more. And thus they have been pushed further into the arms of Russia.

          The classic American imperialists refuse to accept that by sanctioning a country into oblivion they will now just join China and Russia’s side. They have alternative options.

          Most Americans don’t even know why North Korea is so hostile. We bombed them into oblivion during the Korean war.

          • @tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            Well yes because America had been pushing North Korea away.

            The classic American imperialists refuse to accept that by sanctioning a country into oblivion they will now just join China and Russia’s side.

            Most Americans don’t even know why North Korea is so hostile. We bombed them into oblivion during the Korean war.

            What the fuck is this revisionist history?

            North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950, after the South refused Northern rule. The UN stepped in (90% American forces) pushing the North Koreans nearly to China’s borders, at which point China entered the war, and resulting in the 38th parallel armistice border we have today.

            North Korea wasn’t pushed into China’s welcoming arms due to American anti-nuclear proliferation sanctions of the last twenty years, and “being bombed into oblivion” is often the result of picking on countries with bigger allies than you, just ask Germany and Japan.

            China has propped up the Kim dictatorship dynasty for the last 70 years, feeding their starving masses while the Kims focus the country’s resources on military spending, including nuclear development to substantiate their annual saber rattling. Allowing China to maintain a buffer state, that’s kept the West at bay since 1951.

      • @deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        NK & SK were making historical progress towards reunification until Kim and Trump met. Look at the pics from the summit and the timeline of inter Korean relations and it’s clear as day. He’s the reason relations went downhill.

  • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1351 year ago

    I hope everyone that keeps down voting me for talking about WW3 are right…

    But man, it really is starting to look like WW3

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      741 year ago

      People forgot how long it took the other world wars to really get rolling. (Presumably because they weren’t alive when it happened.)

      I’m also of the opinion that unless something happens to de-escalate this conflict it will inevitably draw Europe, the US, and China in.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        361 year ago

        Everybody is already in and picked the side…

        We just waiting for the other shoe to drop… Is US Marines landing in Crimea or other wild scenario where everyone goes: " well damn and that’s how it turned into ww3"

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        301 year ago

        They also forget about the 4+1 treaty.

        If Israel expands to other countries, it would draw Russia in on their side, and the US on Israel’s

        Which now also brings NK in. And we’ve got a multi front multi country war with two distinct fronts.

        People might not call it WW3, but there’s a world war coming straight ahead, and as good of a movie as it was, I dont want to recreate the Titanic

      • @deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It didn’t take long at all for WW1 to get rolling.

        June 28, 1914 Archduke Francis Ferdinand is assassinated.

        July 28, 1914 Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia, beginning World War I

        WW1 has an insane pace compared to WW2. Battles where a single day has casualty numbers that compare to an entire month past D-day.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They didn’t start calling WWII what it is until 1944, but I think we can all agree it didn’t start in 1944.
      Just like later historians placed the start of WWII on multiple different events depending on which country you’re in, the start of World War III will be long before we start calling it that.
      I’m in the camp that the start of WW3 will be the Russian invasion of Ukraine if things continue to escalate the way they’re going, because that’s when you really started seeing lines being drawn between the axis and allies.
      Russia, China, Iran, and NK are the most recognizable names that have aligned themselves with the axis so far.
      The lines are already drawn and future events will dictate whether or not we’re currently living in WW3 today.

        • @Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Pretty sure Iran adopted “Axis of Resistance” already. Least they already know what side they are on.

          Really getting sick of people deciding to just like…starting shit instead of focusing on constructive competitions like science or space races to other planets. Why do people feel the need to kill the shit out of each other and subjugate their population whilst climate change is bearing down on us? :p

          • @raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            I am also sick to the core about this aspect of humanity. I feel that we as a species are just about developed enough to understand how a better world would look like, and how people should act, what’s “the right thing to do” - and very much not developed enough to overcome our egoism and narcissism to make it happen, so we do the wrong thing despite knowing better far too often.

            • bluGill
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over. You want to be friends with the people in your village, but if you kill the next one you can expand your farm/hunting/gathering grounds and then leave it to your kids - while otherwise you won’t have enough food for all the kids and your DNA is in danger of not getting passed on.

              In our modern world we mostly have plenty of food (and when we don’t lack of land is not the issue), but that isn’t what our DNA is evolved to “think”

              • @raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                For most of history you would be better off if you could kill the next village over.

                That is an incredibly stupid take. For most of history, the planet was so vast that people had plenty of room to hunt / farm / whatever. And no, killing other humans is not in our DNA, the only people who feel like that are those with brain damage / development defects.

                • bluGill
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Most of the planet was not accessable. It was there but your local population grew until the land couldn’t support more. There wasn’t much opportunity to move as the surronding villages had the same problem.

                  of course when a famon came you got a few generations of peace here and there

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        And some would argue that WW1 was WW2 and WW2 WAS WW3. The 7 years war/French and Indian (not French vs Indian) war are commonly referred to as the real first world war. And then the Nepoleonic wars are similarly thought of by some to have been a world war of sorts

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          WWI was called the great war, and the war to end all wars until WWII broke out. I sometimes call WWII just the great war part 2 - the treaties that “ended” WWI were clearly setup (on hindsight!) to make the war break out again in the future when Germany got sick of those treaties.

          The point is names are added after the fact and often don’t make a lot of sense if you know details.

            • @deranger@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              He was right for the wrong reasons. He believed the treaty was too lenient, when in retrospect it seems pretty clear that the punitive nature of the treaty was a significant factor in Hitler rising to power and then WW2 starting.

          • BigFig
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            For sure, I know allll about that stuff (former history teacher)

    • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 year ago

      To me it looks like N Korea wanting to acquire some direct combat experience to continue to develop their skills and capabilities.

      But yes, personally I was not expecting this.

    • @DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not really, proxy wars have been fought with multiple nations before.

      … practically everyone was in Syria… Russia, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Qatar, The USA, ISIS, Al-queda, and Syrian forces.

      • Pennomi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        Not exactly a proxy war when Russian troops are personally in Ukraine. That’s just a war.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Korean War had over a million NATO troops and also tens of thousands of Soviet troops and, somehow, remained a proxy war. A particularly bloody one, but there was still no actual open full-scale warfare between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even China and America remained officially at peace, despite making up the majority of the forces on each side

            • Skua
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Apologies, I was using “NATO troops” as a shorthand for the large number of countries involved rather than the specific command structure. You are right to bring that up

        • @Mechanize@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Russia is actively in Syria from the end of 2015 as an official belligerent, it’s not something new for Russia to fight directly while others use only proxies.

          But I can see your point; still - officially - this is only a three days military operation. When that stance will finally change in the official channels, it will mean they can’t hold the mask anymore.

        • @DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s a proxy war because the two major powers are fighting in an area neither of them own.

          Iraq was a proxy war, even though US troops were there.

    • DominusOfMegadeus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To me, it does not seem wise to just let these two continue along this path, but I am certain there are numerous internet experts out there who can explain to me why we should not intervene.

      • @ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        251 year ago

        How would you propose the intervention happen? Sit Kim down and say “bad boy, stop it”?

        What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

        Russia isn’t going to stop them from crossing their border.

        • @btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          What can “the west” really do to prevent or stop troops from NK being sent to the Ukraine front?

          Drop leaflets on them inviting them to surrender and upgrade their lives to South Korean national.

          • @ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Hmmm. While that would technically stop Russia from needing the troops in Ukraine, I don’t think that just giving a dictator sections of land because he claimed them is a good path.

            “Just give up when I take your shit” is a shit take.

        • dactylotheca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          291 year ago

          Fuck Israel, but that being said what the hell does Israel have to do with anything here?

          • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            151 year ago

            Israel and Hezbollah have been exchanging rocket fire, and Israel is talking about a ground invasion.

            Hezbollah has a defense treaty with Iran, Iraq, Russia, and another ME country I’m blanking on.

            If Israel invaded Lebanon in an attack on Hezbollah, that draws in Russia, and likely NK.

            Israel and Russia are the two countries invading others that I believe are the primary drivers towards WW3. NK is just a long for the ride until/unless they launch an attack on SK.

            But I think before that happens, we’ll solidly be in WW3. I think NK is onboard now, with the promise to be backed against SK later. No one is attack NK unless NK starts some shit, they don’t need a defense treaty.

    • @Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      The truth is, we don’t fucking know. No expert would tell you that Russia is ready to invade Ukraine, and here we go.

      • bluGill
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Be careful here. Experts would tell you that Russia was going to invade Ukraine. However as you say Russia wasn’t ready for it.

      • @someacnt_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I wasn’t even an expert but I knew they would do that just by distribution of military. Did not expect Civ 5 to be accurate, tho

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I honestly think he might legitimately believe that a couple platoons of NK soldiers will clear this whole mess right up and then the world will have to take them seriously.

        The North Korean leadership is not exactly well known for their excellent grasp of reality.

        • @Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My thought is maybe either food or arms or research for arms production/nukes from the Russians.

          Edit Addendum: the article says as much actually lol. This is what I get for just trying to get an idea of NK actions from the title.

    • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      a yes, one country against the entire world, truly the ww3 of all times, we downvote your take is stupid

    • @Furball@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      691 year ago

      I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the US announced it would lift the ban on American contractors going to Ukraine at the same time as this. Russia reaps what it sows. Ukraine gets highly payed and skilled contractors, in return, Russia gets malnourished and untrained Korean conscripts.

      • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        The North Koreans are perfect for the Russian tactic of forcing the Ukrainians to deplete their ammo by throwing meat at them.

      • @Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I dont think it’s quite the same thing though. US contractors won’t be fighting, I think they’ll just be maintaining and repairing equipment.

        • acargitz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          231 year ago

          Arguably, a much more critical job for a capital-intensive army.

          • @chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            171 year ago

            Yes, it’s actually huge. Especially for maintaining a weapon as complicated as an Abrams tank. If it can be repaired close to the front lines then that has the potential to cut days off the turnaround time compared to towing it over to Poland.

      • @btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Russia gets malnourished and untrained Korean conscripts.

        Just offer them all plane tickets to South Korea. Problem solved.

      • @Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I wonder if many will even fight? If I were from North Korea, I’d consider surrender to be a godsend. They would do terrible things to the family members, though… I guess that’s the true cruelty of regimes like this. They punish the people you love.

    • @azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      According to Russian propaganda Ukraine has been doing just that the entire time, but if it actually happened that would be yet another red line to cross.

  • @Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    631 year ago

    Time to translate those surrender instruction leaflets to Korean. Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

      • @Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Ukrain is a country of 40 million people, with millions already internally displaced from the war. A few thousand extra refugees wouldnt even be noticed.

    • @btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Maybe go ahead and plan to build a large camp for malnourished people.

      Or just invite the South Korean government to send agents to Ukraine to invite them all to South Korea.

  • @Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    These guys will have a better time in Ukrainian captivity than 99% of the population at home…

  • Eww
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    Curious how many will defect once outside North Korea.

  • AlexanderESmith
    link
    fedilink
    401 year ago

    I’m putting good money down that they either have mass surrenders, or they’re just too malnourished to fight.

    Possibly both.

    Oh, oh! Or they refuse to come back from Russia, and that pisses off NK .

    • @Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      481 year ago

      My money is on NK never sending anyone and this all being political theater. Please. Please please please.

    • @frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I suspect NK will kill their families if they refuse to come back, but I’d be completely unsurprised if some fake their deaths and try to disappear.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Then it’d just be NK sending a bunch of soldiers who get to emigrate to Ukraine.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    Not a single one of those support troops has any combat experience.

    So good luck, guys.

  • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’re getting a lot closer to a bigger global conflict as NK troops and American Military contractors begin to enter the fray. Anyone else feel like were inching closer to World War than we’ve been since the last one ended?

    • @mecfs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      491 year ago

      We’ve been inching closer and closer ever since 2014. Is not an excuse to abandon Ukraine though. Russia won’t stop cause we give them some land.

  • @Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    Funny thing is the eventual survivor won’t be brought back to NK after having seen the lavish lifes the russians live…

  • @egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Does north korea have actually good military power? I’ve seen their parades here and there, but does anyone know if they have updated equipment, trained military personnel, good intelligence, etc?

    • Caveman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      They have massive amount of soldiers and are good and making artillery and missiles. It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

      Their economy is practically built for conflict so it shouldn’t be taken lightly.

      • @egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Yeah, I don’t think numbers is everything, lacking experience or leadership can tip the balance against you in a blink

        • Caveman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Yeah, I have a feeling that they will have very low morale because of lack of motivating factors. Desertion might also become a massive problem since this is one of the few ways to get out of the DPRK.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        It is a big black box however since they haven’t been engaged in a conflict recently so all their troops lack experience.

        They’ve been deployed to Syria since at least 2019 and assisted Hezbollah in its tunnel networks going back decades.

  • NoSpiritAnimal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    News in 30 days: Digestive Parasites are up 70,000% in Eastern Ukraine.

    • @dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      761 year ago

      You don’t see the difference in supporting a country defending itself from being invaded versus aiding a country that is invading?

    • AmbiguousProps
      link
      fedilink
      English
      561 year ago

      It’s almost like Ukraine is better than NK, from a moral and logical perspective. Ukraine isn’t starving their own people, nor are they “disappearing” the local Muslim population á-la China. They’re simply defending themselves.

      • @TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        According to you logic US it’s supporting Israel so I believe your “moral” and “logic” is pretty twisted…

        • AmbiguousProps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The US isn’t sending troops into Gaza. This story is about NK sending troops into Ukraine. It’s not hard to see the clear difference.

          • @TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Nice slippery slope…

            Edit: Israel didn’t even need soldiers, Palestinians didn’t even have weapons to defend themselves and are starving to death, so money and weapons will do the work to continue with the genocide.

            • AmbiguousProps
              link
              fedilink
              English
              271 year ago

              Huh? In what way was what I said a “slippery slope”? This article is literally talking about NK sending troops to Ukraine. I wasn’t even the one to bring up NATO or the US in the first place.

              I wholeheartedly believe Palestine should be freed and that we shouldn’t be supplying weapons at all. The genocide is disgusting. But at least the US isn’t using US troops, nor are they doing trade deals to send more poor people into Gaza (like NK and Russia are doing in this article, except in Ukraine instead of Gaza).

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          There they are! The gENoSiDe JoE contingent. Still a bunch of y’all wandering around unblocked. Not to worry!

      • @Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Remind me how many Neo-Nazi battalions are in the DPRK? Or where in the DPRK constitution there is a provision to protect their gene pool?

        • AmbiguousProps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 year ago

          What does that have to do with anything? Are you attempting to say Ukraine has those and therefore all of Ukraine deserves to be killed? Good job attempting to change the subject, I guess. Better invade every country on earth since Nazis are literally everywhere, civilian casualties be damned. Better invade your own country too.

          PS. Russia does not actually care about Nazis, they have their own after all. They only want Ukraine’s land, ports, and people.

        • @btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          The Neo-Nazis are in Russia working with NK.

          The Axis of Evil

          Treason Trump - War Criminal Putin - Caligula Jong Un - Comrade Xi

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      I don’t think anyone is saying they shouldn’t be allowed to do it; just that they think it’s going to go poorly

      Also I would add that it’s a moderately dire sign as far as the state of Russia’s manpower levels. Every country at war desperately wants more soldiers at all times but some desperates are more desperate than other desperates.

    • @Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Financial support and sending foreign soldiers directly to the frontline are two very different kinds of involvement. Imagine the Russian freakout if NATO actually sent soldiers to fight in Ukraine. Maybe the North Koreans will actually speed that process up.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      If China directly supports Russia NATO will throw sanctions on them and that will hurt China. China is supporting Russia, but they are walking a find line as China cannot afford to make NATO mad. (NATO also will hurt, which is why NATO is looking the other way, but how long will NATO put up with China is an open question)

      • @jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        All the west should sanction China. But we need to have toilet paper production back onshore first.

    • @Bremmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Of course you don’t see the problem. You can’t seem to see the problem with a lot of issues. Your average post score is -20. Maybe you should do some self reflection, or maybe you’re just a naive 20-something and will grow out of it