• @bolditalicroman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22110 months ago

    For anyone wondering, Deutschland, Duitsland and Tyskland all have the same latin root “theodiscus” that became “deutsch”. “Allemagne” derives from a germanic tribe, the “Alemanni” who lived in modern day Germany and bordered modern day france. Niemcy and Nemetorszag both stem from old slavic “nem” (or something similar) meaning “mute”. They called the Germanic tribes they interacted with mute because they couldn’t understand them. “Saksa” is derived from the German region “Saxony”.

    Please correct me in case i got something wrong.

    • @Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      5810 months ago

      The Latin root theodiscus is actually just the latinised form of the Old High German thiutisk from Indo-European teuta and means “people”. Similarly, Alemanni means “all men”. The Saxons were named after their typical sword or fighting knive, the Seax or Sax. It’s still discussed where the term “German” originates from.

      • @barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        2110 months ago

        The Saxons were named after their typical sword or fighting knive, the Seax or Sax.

        There’s also a possibility the name is related to “settling”, and the knife then probably named after the tribe.

      • @paschko_mato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        I thought German means spearman. Because some tribes fighted with the „Ger“, a spear or some special spear(?). Or is this only a theory?

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Lots of things are possible, fewer are likely, even fewer attested, even fewer attested without doubt.

          Though it’d have a special irony to it: Some Roman asking a bunch of probably Austro-Bavarian or Alemanic warriors “who are you” and getting the answer “Germannen” – “spear men”. Were Italy an Island they would’ve said “sailors”.

          Probably more likely than Romans observing those tribes, noting more or less bog-standard javelins, not exactly a rare or particularly notable technology, and saying “hey let’s ask them what they call javelins and add a -man after that for no apparent reason”. Even if they specialised their tactics etc. around those spears would you call Greeks “Phalanx people”?

    • @ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      3510 months ago

      For good measure, in Arabic, Niemcy (actually “Namsa”) is what we call Austria. Germany is “Almania”, same as in French.

      Of course, we have as many curveballs as you could want for European place names. Like Venice. Somehow we ended up with “Al Bunduqiya” for Venice. Have fun with that one.

    • @modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2210 months ago

      Just to add one more sidenote: France is of course named after the Franks, a German people who lived next door to the Alemanni and the Saxons.

      • @barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        Still do, Franken is on the one hand a part of Bavaria very insistent on not actually being Bavarian (and they’re right), OTOH a dialect continuum reaching over the Ruhr area up to Flanders and Holland.

        Charlemagne was a prince of Austrasia, just another guy in a long dynasty of conquerors but notably the one to conquer Rome (and conversion-by-genocide of the Saxons). Also a lot more Gauls back in the day in France before they went all national state and suppressed minority languages in favour of sounding more Roman.

        • @Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          510 months ago

          Okay then, where’d Rome come up with it? Oh, “the land of the Germani,” but scholars are divided on the origin of Germani. Possibly from Celt gair, “neighbor.” Or maybe from a few other sources.

          The word germ also comes from Latin, “sprout” but I’m not seeing anything like “people who sprout” or “from the land of sprouting seeds” or anything else to connect them at all. It’s more like ger+man.

    • @antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Niemcy and Nemetorszag both stem from old slavic “nem” (or something similar) meaning “mute”.

      More precisely, the first one is from Proto-Slavic root *něm- (“mute”) and suffix *-ьcь (“person with that characteristic”); ě was not quite the same sound as e, so linguists mark it with the haček, just as it is marked in Czech to this day. In modern languages the nationality is called: Ru. nemec, Pol. Niemiec, Cro. Nijemac… But the country itself is called Ru. Germanija (from Latin), Pol. Niemcy (literally plural “Germans”), Cro. Njemačka (actually a feminine adjective, taken from the syntagm “Njemačka zemlja” = “German land”).

      The Hungarian name is a combination of the Slavic loaned *němьcь > “német” (“German”) and “ország” (“land”): Németország.

    • @thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      I’m guessing saksa is more like the others and based on the Saxon people that once lived there rather than the modern region named for the same

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      the “Alemanni” who lived in modern day Germany and bordered modern day france.

      Alemans still live in Baden-Württemberg, parts of Bavaria, Switzerland and I think there’s also a splattering in Austria. Basically, High Germans which aren’t Austro-Bavarian (same culture, different kingdoms) are Alemans.

      “Saksa” is derived from the German region “Saxony”.

      That one can be a bit misleading: The modern state of Saxony has nothing to do with the Saxon tribe, the place the title was applied to slowly drifted over the ages. They’re much more related to Prussians and Thuringians and even Franks, going all the way over to Flanders and Holland, than Saxons proper. (Holland, not Netherlands).

      Here’s a rough splotch of where Old Saxon was spoken, which you can consider “core Saxony”. At least linguistics-wise it spread quite a bit especially during the days of the Hanse (becoming a minority language as far up as Estonia), but it definitely stops before arriving at a place where “goose meat” means “could you please”. Utter gibberish.

      • @zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        The original saxons lived more or less in the area of modern day lower saxony, that is north west germany.

    • @wieson@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      1010 months ago

      thiutisk/ theodisk is from a Germanic/ old high German root meaning “belonging to the people”

      As is the root of most self descriptions, the name of a group for themselves means “we” or “the people” or “humans”.

  • @merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    8210 months ago

    This is why I think Turkey’s insistence it be called “Türkiye” in English is dumb. English doesn’t use umlauts, most English speakers can’t even pronounce “ü” properly. English doesn’t use “iye” sounds. They should be happy that the country is more-or-less pronounced the way it sounds in Turkish.

    I mean, look at some of Turkey’s neighbours. Georgia, pronounced “sakartvelo” by the locals. Armenia, called “Hayastan” by the people who live there. Greece, called “Elláda” by people who speak Greek (sorry, speak “elliniká”).

    People aren’t speaking your language when they’re talking about your country, they’re speaking their own language, and “Turkey” is about as close as English gets to “Türkiye”

  • @samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    54
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Germany: “Fine, fine, we’re Germany to you. You could have called us Dutchland instead of using that for people from the Netherlands, but whatever.”

    USA: pointing to people who settled Pennsylvania from Germany “Pennsylvania Dutch!”

    Germany: ಠ_ಠ

          • Skua
            link
            fedilink
            1510 months ago

            There are earlier instances in which rulers of the HRE would refer to themselves as “Holy Roman Emperor and king of the Germans” as separate titles (usually along with a whole bunch more, as was the way of powerful feudal rulers). When they did this usually depended on who the intended audience was. Speaking to the king of France and don’t much like him? Assert your position as heir to the Roman Empire and therefore above him. Trying to get on good terms with the Byzantine emperor, who considers your claim to the Roman Empire to be a usurpation of his own title? Probably call yourself king of the Germans.

            • @Successful_Try543@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              710 months ago

              These actually were two different titles. The king of the Germans was elected from the twelve Prince-electors (Kurfürsten). After Otto the Great, it became tradition that the current King of the Germans became crowned by the bishop of Rome aka. the pope, as Roman Emperor. However, at least in the beginning this was no automatism. Thus, not all German kings became Roman Emperor.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      3010 months ago

      English-speakers used to use it to mean all non-Scandinavian Germanic peoples. When the Netherlanders became a distinctly separate group Britain had way more contact with them than with anyone else that the word used to cover, so we used it to refer to them specifically

      • kronisk
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        TIL that “dutch” and “deutsch” comes from the same root!

      • @xJREB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        If I remember correctly, this is also one of the leading explanations why the Pennsylvania Dutch are called like that even though they speak German (or a German dialect).

  • @norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2710 months ago

    I personally find it worse, if city names are very different. Like Krung Thep Maha Nakhon (…) as Bangkok. Most Thai people just say Krung Thep, why can’t the rest of the world? I mean, they only changed the name in 1782…

    Or Italians call Munich ‘Monaco’ which is really confusing because there is literally a country not that far away.

  • @norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2510 months ago

    Deutschland is a fairly new word. Before that there were a multitude of germanic tribes and those have made their way into the language of our neighbours as the name of the country

    Germanen, Allemannen, Sachsen to name a few.

    Deutsch, Tysk, Tedesco… come from the Latin “theudo” - “das Volk/the people”

    • @SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      Also why the Nederlanders are called Dutch by English speakers. Since the Dutch descent from a bunch of Germanic tribes.

      • @norimee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Dutch has the same word origin as Deutsch. Obviously. The Latin “theudo” - “the people”.

        Back in the days, when the whole region belonged to the Holy Roman Empire and were not seperate countries yet, “dutch” refered to Nederlanders and germans both. The fact that they decent from germanic tribes is the reason the word “dutch” makes sense actually.

        I find it way more weird that they call Deutsche germans now. Keeping the word dutch for germans would make much more sense in my opinion.

  • Bezier
    link
    fedilink
    2410 months ago

    So, anyone wanna revive one of the polandball communities or open a new one?

    • Servais (il/le)OP
      link
      fedilink
      1610 months ago

      I posted a few European Polandball comics here, I think it fits the mood

      Polandball on a world scale might need some heavy moderation due to potential political debates

  • @rainynight65@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2310 months ago

    The funny thing is that most languages in the world call Finland Finland or something adjacent (usually containing the syllable ‘Fin-’), while it’s ‘Suomi’ in Finnish. Only the Baltic states call it something similar to that.

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      France puts a lot of effort into evolving the language very specifically to avoid loanwords and the perceived dilution of the language they might create. They have an entire government cultural body responsible for this.

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      Goes all the way back to at least Proto-Germanic *finnaz for Sami, possibly from “to travel by foot, walk”. Not terribly unrealistic given the semi-nomadic lifestyle of Sami, Sami and Suomi might just be the same word via general Uralic relatedness (and sound the same to Germanic ears anyway) also what’s now considered Finns was back then a rough assemblage of tribes consisting of multiple Uralic immigration waves known to Swedes as “Forest Finns”, as supposed to the herding Finns (ie. nowadays Sami) further north.

      Which I guess makes Estonians Swamp Finns (in so far as Finland-Finns aren’t claiming that one for themselves with their swamp forests) and Hungarians… Paprika Finns.

  • Malgas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2210 months ago

    IIRC a lot (all?) of these come from the names of specific Germanic tribes that these languages had contact with back before Germany existed as a unified entity, which then metathesized into a demonym for the entire cultural group and then the nation state. “Saksa”, for example, is a doublet of “Saxon”.

      • FauxPseudo
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        Everyone uses the name that China used. I guess that’s the benefit and downside of only having one neighbor.

        • FauxPseudo
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          This caused me to think about upside versus downside and benefit versus some word that isn’t anti-benefit, unbenefit, abenefit, ilbenefit, irbenefit, imbenefit, inbenefit, debenefit, disbenefit. There is no etymological related antonym to benefit.

    • kronisk
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Without thinking much about it, my guess would be the United States of America.

      Edit: my reasoning was that most countries translate USA verbatim to their language, as most replies here demonstrate.

        • kronisk
          link
          fedilink
          410 months ago

          Translation, in order: The United States of America, The United States of America and The United States of America.

            • kronisk
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Remember the meme? Deutschland, Duitsland, Tyskland are all regional variations on the same name. Allemagne and Germany are completely different names for the same country. Of course every language have their own way of saying “The United States of America”, but in essence it’s the same word, the same idea. Even Japan is Japón in Spanish, Ιαπωνία in greek, and so on. No one can pronounce my name correctly if I go abroad, but most of the time there is a regional variant I can use.

              The question was what country is known “by the same name” by the most people around the world. You’re not going to find a place name that is pronounced and/or written exactly the same in every language. That’s how languages work.

        • kronisk
          link
          fedilink
          610 months ago

          Finnish doesn’t count, having completely unrelated names for everything is like a sport to you people

          • @boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            It’s not even unrelated, it’s a literal translation of “United States” to Finnish

            Similarly in Estonian sometimes we’d just call it Ühendriigid instead of Ameerika Ühendriigid

      • @myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Amerikas Forenede Stater?

        But yeah, it’s too long, we usually call it USA. Although we pronounce the letters in the local way.

    • @sunbather@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      suggestions off the top of my head are countries with or near significant colonial influences, eg madagascar and indonesia seem to be pretty similar across the board

      although far from comprehensive such is the case of languages listed on wiktionarys translations dropdown on the english entries of the countries at least

      the only notable exception i spotted is the navajo name for indonesia apparently being “Kéyah Dah Ndaaʼeełí Łání” which is quite interesting and i dont really have an explanation for that discrepancy (perhaps its pronounced similarly and orthography just isnt idunno) but navajo isnt a national language anywhere anyways so it doesnt really matter for the original question

  • tiredofsametab
    link
    fedilink
    910 months ago

    Japanese:

    Germany - ドイツ (doitsu) - or 独逸 or 独乙 if you’re feeling nasty.

    Nederlands - オランダ (oranda which comes from the word holland) - 阿蘭陀 and a few other kanji forms exist as well

    • @lemmysarius@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      Well, the German people are called “Deutsche” which sounds very similar to doitsu when spoken. And if someone is a German the he is “Deutsch”.

      Also Finland doesn’t sound that wrong, just ancient. One of the larger “Clans” that lived in the area that later was called Germany were the Saxons, in German “Sachsen” which again sounds very similar to Saksa. No idea if that’s the actual reason for the word though.