Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2823 months ago

    I seem to recall that fElon prevented the self driving team from utilizing LIDAR for any part of the system, instead demanding that everything run off of optical input. Does anyone else remember the same?

      • @cyd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        363 months ago

        Funny thing is, the price of lidar is dropping like a stone; they are projected to be sub-$200 per unit soon. The technical consensus seems to be settling in on 2 or 3 lidars per car plus optical sensors, and Chinese EV brands are starting to provide self driving in baseline models, with lidars as part of the standard package.

      • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        83 months ago

        Ah okay. I was genuinely curious if I was remembering correctly because I definitely know it’s been awhile since I’d read anything on the subject.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What’s cool is that Teslas used to have radar sensors, at least, but Elon removed them from production to save money. Even if you have a car from back then, the software no longer uses them and they’ll just physically unplug them the next time you have the car serviced, as it’s just a drain on the battery at this point 🙃

      • The Quuuuuill
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 months ago

        meanwhile our subaru has lidar for adaptive cruise control and emergency braking

        • @fulg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I didn’t realize EyeSight had different versions, on the Solterra it looks like it is indeed LIDAR.

          My Crosstrek has the older dual camera setup for depth perception, it would not be fooled by a picture of a road on a wall… I’m surprised the Teslas are.

      • MedicsOfAnarchy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        they’ll just physically unplug them the next time you have the car serviced

        So, (looks at watch), in an hour?

    • @SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      253 months ago

      Yes, I recall at the time experts saying it was a terrible mistake and Elon saying Machine learning will bridge the gap.

      The real reason was to increase margins.

    • paraphrand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      203 months ago

      I remember there being claims from him or his team about lidar being a dead end that would not scale as well as computer vision.

      • @IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        243 months ago

        I believe he claimed that since humans use their vision to drive that computer vision was more than enough.

        I don’t know about you, but I also rely on sounds & feel when I drive. I also know that the human eye has evolved to detect motion, filter out extraneous information, and send just the important bits to the brain so that it doesn’t get overloaded with everything the eye sees. Computer vision is the exact opposite from that, having to process every bit of every image the camera sees.

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          233 months ago

          I also know of many times my vision fails. Driving into a sunrise for example

        • Terrasque
          link
          fedilink
          English
          143 months ago

          since humans use their vision to drive that computer vision was more than enough

          Surprised he didn’t swap out the wheels with legs while he was at it

        • @JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          I don’t know about you, but I also rely on sounds & feel when I drive.

          Of course. When I feel myself driving into a wall, I stop immediately.

    • Kokesh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 months ago

      Came here to actually write this. Everyone remembers that. He made Tesler the hated shit it is today.

      • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 months ago

        As a space nut I seriously hope that he never gets a chance to do anything similar with SpaceX. Thankfully he’s mostly been kept away from important things thus far.

        Don’t get me wrong, I know SpaceX’s closet is overflowing with skeletons. But since Congress has been so kind as to continuously cut NASA’s budget for the last few decades, I have to rely on SpaceX and other private companies to keep our space endeavors going.

        • Kokesh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          I’m (was) huge SpaceX nerd, but last year or so I’m less and less. He always was dumb narcissist asshole, but now I can’t take it anymore. Also the idea that we’ve fucked up this planet and need to move somewhere else, by doing thousands of launches finishing this planet always made me sick. If someone would take him out, I probably would come back to liking the company.

    • @scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yes. He took too much inspiration from Stanford University’s “Stanley” winning the DARPA Grand Challenge in 2005. This was an early completion to build viable autonomous vehicles. Most of them looked like tanks covered in radar dishes but Stanford wound up taking home the gold with just an SUV with cameras on it.

      It was an impressive achievement in computer vision, and the LiDAR-encrusted vehicles wound up looking like over-complex dinosaurs. There’s a great documentary about it narrated by John Lithgow (who, throughout it, pronounces the word robot as “ro-butt”). Elon watched it, made up his mind, and like a moron, hasn’t changed it in 20 years. I’m almost Musk’s age so I know how the years speed up as we go on. He probably thinks about the Stanford win as something that happened relatively recently. Especially with his mind on - ahem - other things, he’s not keeping up with recent developments out in the real world.

      Rober just made Musk look like the absolute tool he is. And I’m a little worried that we may see people out there staging real world versions of this somehow with actual dangerous obstacles, not a cartoonish foam wall.

      • KayLeadfootOP
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        I did low-key get the squiggles before writing the article. I thought, from an ethical hacking disclosure-type perspective, that this info might cause folks to… well, ya know, paint tunnels on walls.

        Then I looked, the cat was already out of the bag, the video had something like 5 million views on it in the 4 hours it took me to draft the article. So I shared it, but I definitely did have that thought cross my mind. I am also a little worried on that score.

    • @kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Is that just to cover his ass cuz he was promising backwards-compatible FSD for models that don’t have LIDAR?

    • Ulrich
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Tesla never had LIDAR. That’s the little spinny thing you see on Waymo cars. They had RADAR, and yes it was removed in 2021 due to supply shortages and just…never reinstalled.

      • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        It was removed due to supply chain, but Musk did seem to legitimately think optical only was better.

  • Mayor Poopington
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1073 months ago

    I read something a while back from a guy while wearing a T-shirt with a stop sign on it, a couple robotaxies stopped in front of him. It got me thinking you could cause some chaos walking around with a speed limit 65 shirt.

    • @audaxdreik@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      473 months ago

      I think one of my favorite examples was using simple salt to trap them within the confines of white lines that they didn’t think they could cross over. I really appreciate the imagery of using salt circles to entrap the robotic demons …

    • @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      163 months ago

      They’re not reading speed limit signs; they’ll follow the speed limit noted on the reference maps, like what you see in the app on your phone.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        323 months ago

        There’s a lot of cars that check via camera too to double check, for missing/outdated information and for temporary speed limit signs.

        • @SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Lots of places also have variable limit signs that get updated based on traffic, accidents etc.

          Here in NZ those seem to all be marked on the speed limit maps as 100km/h even if in some places the signs never go above 80.

          Ngauranga Gorge is one such location and I believe has the country’s highest grossing speed camera.

        • @Giooschi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          93 months ago

          Where I live there are a lot of “temporary” 30km/h speed limits that were never removed by the road workers after the work was completed.

      • @kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yikes, there’s a 25 around here that shows up as a 55 in Google Maps.

        Also a 55 that goes down to I think 35 for just a moment when it joins up with a side road. I wonder what a Tesla would do if it was following that data.

          • @zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            Bahaha, what kind of a bizarre statement is that?

            Was he trying to imply the government only uses spreadsheets and nosql DBs?

            Or did he think it was necessary to point out that your average government employee isn’t writing their own SQL to grab data they need?

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              English
              93 months ago

              Someone said something he didn’t like so he blurted out the first ignorant thing that he thought of, as usual.

            • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              Even then, that’s not really correct. People grab data through sql queries all the time. Mostly because all the front ends are trash.

      • @jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        It was removed because it was giving false positives. They should have upgraded it with lidar but decided to just remove it.

      • @nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Tesla had camera+radar+sonar, and that wasn’t their own tech - they used mobileye EyeQ back then. When they switched to in house tech they gradually ditched the radar and sonar which made no sense to me. But at the time I saw their lead say in an interview that this is superior and I believed. not anymore.

        they said doing so cut costs but obviously lidar/radar/sonar only gets cheaper over time, let alone the extra r&d costs because a vision only system is much more difficult to develop.

  • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    873 months ago

    This is why it’s fucking stupid Tesla removed Lidar sensors and relies on cameras only.

    But also who would want a tesla, fuck em

    • @AreaKode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      383 months ago

      I was horrified when I learned that the autopilot relies entirely on cameras. Nope, nope, nope.

      • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Leon said other sensors were unnecessary because human driving is all done through the sense of sight…proving that he has no idea how humans work either (despite purportedly being a human).

    • @bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      303 months ago

      They never had lidarr. They used to have radar and uss but they decided “vision” was good enough. This conveniently occurred when they had supply chain issues during covid.

    • @Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      213 months ago

      They also removed radar, which is what allowed them to make all of those “it saw something three vehicles ahead and braked to avoid a pileup that hadn’t even started yet” videos. Removing radar was the single most impactful change Tesla made in regards to FSD, and it’s all because Musk basically decided “people drive fine with just their eyes, so cars should too.”

  • Magnus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    833 months ago

    I remember Elon foolishly saying his cars don’t need radar or lidar. Even software-disabling radar in cars that already had the hardware.

    • @gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      203 months ago

      Not even just his cars, he thinks the MILITARY, doesn’t need radar and can just use cameras to spot and track stealth fighters.

      He’s a fucking lunatic.

      • @towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        As an augmentation, the ability to spot and track objects visually would be amazing.
        But then planes just have to fly above 10k ft, and pretty much guaranteed cloud cover.

  • @TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    773 months ago

    And that’s what you get for cheaping out on tech and going with cameras over lidar. Not only that, but Tesla removed all the radar technology that literally every car uses for collision detection about a year ago.

    • KayLeadfootOP
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      The radar module on my truck costs $70.

      The richest man on earth doesn’t think the lives of your vehicle’s passengers are worth $17.50 a pop.

      And that’s to a knuckledragger like me, buying a single radar unit online. I’m sure the manufacturer gets insane quantity discounts.

    • Amon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 months ago

      I wish all MAGAs a very DEI

    • @accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      Huh, now I’m mildly interested in the differences in traffic laws in China vs US vs Europe that lead to Teslas getting more tickets in China than elsewhere.

      • @elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 months ago

        I found this article. My takeaways were:

        1. No driving in bus lanes during certain times of day.
        2. No using the shoulder as a turn lane.
        3. No using a bike lane as a turn lane.
            • @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I think their regs, while seemingly very basic rules of the road, are based because I live in the US and we have bike lanes here that just whole ass turn into turn lanes with almost no warning. I wish we could get basic decency for everyone on the road, too.

              • @elephantium@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 months ago

                Ah, gotcha, yeah, that makes sense.

                My own city has pretty good bike lane coverage, but it’s similar – cars have to cross over the bike lane to get into the turn lane.

                Basic decency…gah. Yeah, I wish. :(

  • @RambaZamba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    503 months ago

    Things that happen when you rely exclusively on optical sensors, i.e. cameras. But that’s just cheaper, more money for Nazi Elon.

    • Inkstain (they/them)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 months ago

      Are we reeeeally sure optical sensors with fast image recognition software are cheaper than LiDAR?

      • @Tzig@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        The hardware is, which is the important part at scale: even if the code is 10x more expensive when you sell millions of the car it becomes pennies/car

    • KayLeadfootOP
      link
      fedilink
      333 months ago

      It’s dirt cheap, too. If this was a cost-cutting measure, it was a thoroughly idiotic one. Which feels like the mark… of a certain someone I can think of

    • @bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      253 months ago

      In short because Elon (wrongly) believes you only need cameras, he made the claim people also drive with just 2 eyes.

      The thing is, we recognize a truck with stickers of a stopsign, while AI vision gets confused.

      Waymo (Googles self driving side hussle) was build on lidar and other sensors and has been using robot taxis for many years now in geofenced specific areas.

        • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          83 months ago

          I was thinking the same thing. What would happen if you popped one out of the back of your car while driving in front of a self driving car on the freeway?

        • @kelseybcool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Some school buses have a sticker / sign on the back that says “I stop for railroad crossings” and can have a stop sign on said sticker.

      • ferret
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        The funny thing is, apparently our depth perception, a product of our two eyes, is a feature beyond the reach of tesla. And it would have allowed to to complete this test.

  • @fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    333 months ago

    There’s a very simple solution to autonomous driving vehicles plowing into walls, cars, or people:

    Congress will pass a law that makes NOBODY liable – as long as a human wasn’t involved in the decision making process during the incident.

    This will be backed by car makers, software providers, and insurance companies, who will lobby hard for it. After all, no SINGLE person or company made the decision to swerve into oncoming traffic. Surely they can’t be held liable. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    Once that happens, Level 4 driving will come standard and likely be the default mode on most cars. Best of luck everyone else!

      • @Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I’ve said for a while that you could shut down an entire city with just a few buddies and like $200 in drywall screws. Have each friend drive on a different highway (or in a different direction on each highway) and sprinkle drywall screws as they go. Not just like a single dump, but a good consistent scatter so the entire highway is a minefield and takes hours to properly sweep up.

  • @Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Entire video is worth watching. He also snuck a chest mounted lidar into Disney and mapped some rides.