Summary

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) warned of uncertainty over Trump’s sweeping new tariffs, saying, “In the long run, we’re all dead,” and slammed blind loyalty to the policy.

While Kennedy didn’t vote against Trump’s emergency tariff powers—unlike four GOP senators—he criticized the lack of clarity on economic impacts.

Trump imposed a 10% baseline tariff on all imports, falsely claiming foreign nations will bear the cost.

Kennedy told Newsmax that predictions on the tariffs’ effects are unreliable, adding anyone claiming certainty is “lying” or “selling deep stupid.”

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    2463 months ago

    “idiot votes for thing he is absolutely against”

    like all conservatives, they lack the will or ability to think or act like autonomous human beings.

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      753 months ago

      He’s a fucking liar.

      If he voted for it, he isn’t against it.

    • classic
      link
      fedilink
      353 months ago

      The political system is inherently set up for politicians to compromise for their self-interest — because money. For personal profit and/or to get re-elected. There was a decent New Yorker article I read on the matter a few years ago that suggested something along the lines that, even if a politician begins their career with the best intentions, the process of getting elected for higher and higher offices erodes those intentions. That’s even if they had any decent intentions to begin with, of course.

      • LupusBlackfur
        link
        fedilink
        173 months ago

        That’s what would happen if something like Career Politicians were allowed to take over the system…

        Oh wait… That happened decades ago… 🤦‍♀️ 🙄

        🤡 🖕 🖕

    • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      they need mitch mcconnell to tell them what to do, unfortunately hes staying away like the snake he is from this mess. the true mastermind of the gop in the party was MITCH.

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    1823 months ago

    While Kennedy didn’t vote against Trump’s emergency tariff powers

    Shut the fuck up then, Senator. Your vote matters. Your comments don’t.

    One more dinosaur who thinks people should give a fuck about things other than his actual actions. Pure distraction.

  • @_chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    633 months ago

    I was fine with the rape and the fraud and the endless lies and the misogyny and the racism and the homophobia and the transphobia and the corruption and the police brutality and the caged babies and the disappearing of citizens and the terrorism and the attempted coup and the autocracy and the ending the rule of law and the threats to invade neighboring countries and the building-a-golf-resort-on-top-of-a-genocide, but now he’s giving Wall Street the jitters, so I’m not so sure about this guy any more.

    credit to https://mstdn.social/@Nickiquote/114275545356485888

  • TipRing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    383 months ago

    If only these Republicans “speaking out” against Trump decimating the economy were members of some kind of political body with the power to stop this executive overreach…

    • @Sprawl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      The problem is their aren’t enough of them willing to speak up so the few that might don’t wish to lose their power, so they remain quiet convincing themselves they are doing the right thing by “living to fight another day”.

    • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      Ignore the edgy teenagers.

      IIRC most recently (as in, 100+ years ago)

      • the anti-slavery movement

      • the pure force of Teddy Roosevelt’s personality

      There was also the “Southern strategy” where the Democratic and Republican party basically flipped due to racism.

    • esa
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      Depends on your country. In countries with proportional representation you can vote for the party you like. If you’re voting tactically you’re down to the coalition you like.

      E.g. here in Norway we get minority coalitions all the time. It’s fine. They have to (gasp) cooperate with others to get anywhere.

  • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    353 months ago

    shouldve convicted him the first 2 times he was impeached, but mitch mcconell has his money and left you all to your fate.

  • Tony Bark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    323 months ago

    There was that no kings act bill. Why not dig that back up?

  • @whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    He’s pulling a McConnell (blocked impeachment consequences both times), have all the power to prevent it and do nothing, then complain when shit happens because of you to try to shift the blame.

    • @LarryLurkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      I’ve been screaming my head off against that asshole for ten years, and I can’t rally democrats to do anything more than play tambourine and sing kumbaya.

    • Kitty Jynx
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      A very highly placed officer would have to take the first step. Servicemen have no access to their weapons or ammunition, this goes double for anything heavier than a rifle. To gain access to any sort of weapons it would take a large conspiracy. Without proper organization and a supply chain even the most capable individual is just a lone crank.

      • @in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        A very highly placed officer would have to take the first step.

        They too have sworn an oath, not only talking about infantry or gruntworkers. More and more that oath seems like a joke.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      they wont, until the economy collapses, and the federal government loses control.

      How many times do we have to explain this, before it starts to make sense. Either you lose control of the military, and the military seizes power (not advantageous to you in this case)

      or the entire society and government structure around it collapses, and it’s basically a free for all power grab because nobody has anything to lose.

  • @SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    183 months ago

    Dam maybe they should stop voting for it and enabling it.

    It’s like they want to support a fascist coup and not be executed when it goes wrong.

  • @Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    183 months ago

    “I mean, granted, I did absolutely no homework about tariffs, nor did I take what basically amounted to all of the economists warnings in consideration, but doggone it, I really thought this con-artist was on to something - and to that, I can’t help but feel a little misled. Is it really my responsibility to make the best decisions for my constituents? Accountability is for suckers and leaders.”

    • @A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      I did absolutely no homework about tariffs

      Yep, it’s this bit that really got me:

      While Kennedy didn’t vote against Trump’s emergency tariff powers he criticized the lack of clarity on economic impacts.

      Understandable for some hillbilly gop voter to complain like that, but a senator? It’s his job to make informed decisions!

      And what are the chances he knew, and didn’t vote against it regardless? Assuming Signalgate shows us the average intelligence of the current government, I’d say 50/50.