I don’t know if it’s the true place to ask, apologizing if not. I started to python one and half week ago. So I’m still beginner.

I made a terminal based weather application with python. What do you think about the code, is it good enough? I mean is it professional enough and how can I make the same functions with more less code?

Here’s the main file (I also added it as url to post): https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheCitizenOne/openweather/refs/heads/main/openweather.py
Here’s the config.json file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TheCitizenOne/openweather/refs/heads/main/config.json

  • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
    12·
    5 months ago

    You appear to be afraid of spaces. Everything is cramped together.

    Just bc you don’t have to put a space after colons or after equals and commas and whatnot doesn’t mean you shouldn’t

    Don’t be afraid of spaces.

    They make it easier for you to read your code when you come back later

      • taaz@biglemmowski.winEnglish
        8·
        5 months ago

        Usually, you would use a formatter anyway - it’s good to know the standard way but for day to day coding I just have a shortcut bound that runs ruff format (you can even have it done automatically on file save).

      • Derp@lemmy.mlBanned
        6·
        5 months ago

        Not the original commenter, but no need to apologise my friend. Nice work. Learning tip from me: give PEP 8 a read and save it for reference somewhere. It’s the standard for how to format Python code, and future you will thank you for internalising it early on in your Python journey

    • citizen@lemmy.worldOP
      1·
      5 months ago

      I revised the code. Added some spaces and comments for better readability. Hope it’s better now.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlBannedEnglish
    6·
    5 months ago

    I started to python one and half week ago. So I’m still beginner.

    Nice work! Here are a few notes:

    The WeatherApp object has a mix of attributes with long-term (eg self.LOCATIONS) and short-term (eg self.city) relevance. Instance attributes introduced in places other than __init__, which makes it non-trivial for a reader to quickly understand what the object contains. And, actually, self.{city,lat,lon} are all only used from the add_city method so they could/should be local variables instead of instance attributes (just remove the self. from them).

    There seem to maybe be some bugs around when things are lowercase and when not; for example checking if self.city.lower() in self.LOCATIONS but then when writing there the non-lower self.ctiy is used as the key to self.LOCATIONS.

    The code under if rep == "1" and elif rep == "2" is mostly duplicated, and there is no else branch to cover if rep is something other than 1 or 2.

    It looks like the config only persists favorites so far (and not non-favorite cities which the user can add) which isn’t obvious from the user interface.

    Passing both location and locations into WeatherAPI so that it can look up locations[location] is unnecessary; it would be clearer to pass in the dict for the specific location. It would also be possible to avoid the need for LOWLOCATIONS by adding a non-lowercase name key to the per-location dictionaries that just have lat and lon right now, and then keeping LOCATIONS keyed by the lowercase names.

    HTH! happy hacking :)