cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/37022405

This is a carrier in the USA (T-Mobile).

I did a quick search for the other 2 carriers using the term “[Carrier Name] Family Tracking” and Verizon and AT&T also seems to have it.

And according to https://www.t-mobile.com/support/plans-features/t-mobile-familywhere-app, it says:

FamilyWhere uses geolocation data from the T-Mobile network and is not affected by changes to device location settings.

So it appears that its using cell tower triangulation. Turning on Airplane Mode should stop it (assuming there isn’t a separate tracking app on your phone)

Oh Wow, What a wonderful tool for abusive spouses and abusive parents. And telecom companies are making money off of it. 🙃

TLDR: Its a good idea to get your own separate cellular plan.

  • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7221 days ago

    This is a useful feature. If you are in an abusive household, then yes you should have as much financial separation as possible. For those that are in a happy and functional family with kids that you want to allow freedom for, this provides a measure of safety if you need it for potential emergency’s or if they aren’t answering the phone or whatever.

    • @Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1721 days ago

      This is a problem even without this. The account owner can get lists of all outbound calls of their victim’s line if they share a plan.

      The fcc requires some remediation if a domestic abuse order is submitted but obviously that’s at the far end of the abuse cycle.

      The issue here can be traced all the way to phone companies pushing the very concept of family plans because it makes churn more difficult.

      An abuser can shut off their victim’s phone line on a whim with convenient online interfaces.

      Phone companies don’t treat their customers will respect because their is no requirement. No one of adult age should be subjected to any of these controls simply because someone else pays.

      The health industry has rules around this. The moment a child hits 18, their claims disappear and the parent loses access to medical records.

      There is absolutely no reason phones should not have the same restrictions but the industry lacks the will and will until the fcc or other three letter agency forces the issue.

    • @tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      620 days ago

      If you are in a healthy relationship, you can do this voluntarily and for free using functionality built into the OS or third party apps, without paying your network operator $10/mo

      • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        420 days ago

        Agreed. My wife and I are both on iOS so there is no need for this feature. Our daughter when she is old enough for a cellphone, would be the one I’d use this for since she can’t turn it off.

    • @superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      519 days ago

      Unpopular opinion: Your kids do not actually have freedom if you’re tracking them.
      Even if it is “just for emergencies” and “we don’t actually look at it”.
      I enjoyed a completely untracked childhood, and I will make damn sure my kids can have that too.
      Just knowing that your parents trust you is a priceless feeling.

      • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        119 days ago

        Unpopular opinion: Your kids do not actually have freedom if you’re tracking them.

        This is just false, and your definition of ‘freedom’ is nothing but sophistry.

        • @superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          119 days ago

          It can’t be false, since it is not a statement of an objective fact.
          It is my opinion, based on my personal view of what “freedom” means to me.

  • irotsoma
    link
    fedilink
    4821 days ago

    Not a new thing, and I can definitely see good uses for this information. What they should have done is made it so that the one being tracked gets a log and real time notification any time someone is tracking them. This would alleviate some of the toxic spying behavior simply by making it transparent rather than covert.

  • @Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    2221 days ago

    This is going to get DV victims killed. At least on phone tracking like iPhone’s family sharing makes it clear it’s happening and often has a way of disabling it when you make your final run for it allowing you to keep your phone.

  • @Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1521 days ago

    If we didn’t have this, my kids would have a lot less freedom. Knowing where they are gives me much more peace of mind to let them roam further, and for longer than I would otherwise 🤷‍♂️

    • LinkOpensChest.wav
      link
      fedilink
      2121 days ago

      I understand wanting to do this as a parent, but I’m so thankful I grew up without cell phones. I would never track a teenager. I feel like teenagers need space to assert their own autonomy and form an identity apart from their parents. When I think of the best moments I had with friends, it’s almost always something that would have technically gone against my parents’ knowledge and wishes, even though my parents were very good to me overall.

    • @comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      1821 days ago

      I grew up in a time before cell phones, I had a lot more freedom than your kids will ever experience. Crime rates were much higher back then by the way. I still survived even though my parents rarely knew where I was between 4 and 6 pm, but I was always home in time for dinner.

          • @Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            15
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Several kids from my elementary school disappeared, never to be heard from again. This happened again in middle school, and twice in high school.

            Just because you weren’t paying attention back then or don’t remember now doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. As you said, crime was worse then.

            Basically any time someone says “This didn’t happen back in my day!” the response can be “the dead ones can’t talk about it.”

            • @swelter_spark@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              120 days ago

              When children are kidnapped, the kidnapper is most often a family member. It happened to a good friend of mine. I don’t see what good cell phone location tracking really does against that, though. A kidnapper can simply take a child’s phone away and toss it.

          • @entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            421 days ago

            That’s not how anecdotal evidence works. Just because you aren’t aware of it being different for others doesn’t mean it wasn’t different for others.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          421 days ago

          There was a time lol

          Kids wouldn’t understand

    • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1721 days ago

      My kids don’t even have phones, as they do not need them and they are unhealthy for the young brain’s development.

      I also don’t use location services on my phones. Fuck all that tracking bullshit.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        921 days ago

        You don’t need to use location services to be tracked by cell towers.

        • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 days ago

          That’s true but it’s not in the same ballpark as GPS tracking. The phone company knows what county I’m in but probably not what businesses and municipal buildings I enter on foot unlike GPS location services. Bluetooth and Wifi are also disabled when I leave the house to minimize those being used for device tracking.

          It’s just good practice to disable all the unused wireless radios in your pocket computer. Don’t turn them on until you need them on. It saves a lot of battery life too.

          • @throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            421 days ago

            The phone company knows what county I’m in but probably not what businesses and municipal buildings I enter on foot unlike GPS location services.

            They have your approximate location. If you are in a densely populated city, they might not know which specific building or which specific apartment unit, but they’ll have a small circle around the area, and if you are in a suburb, where things are more spaced out, they will know the exact stores you go to.

            If you go to a walmart with huge parking spaces all around it, its obvious you went to a walmart.

          • The Octonaut
            link
            fedilink
            321 days ago

            The phone company can get your location down to a few dozen feet depending on the number of 4G (50 to 70 metres) and 5G (10-50 metres) towers around.

          • sunzu2
            link
            fedilink
            321 days ago

            Make sure you turn off your 5g in addition to what OP explained in sister comment

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        A cheap dumbphone could come in handy at almost any age* (calls, short SMS, especially in emergency situations). Though there is a possibility they wouldn’t want to be seen with that. Kids will bully each other for whatever isn’t a norm.
        Anyway, preferably a simpler one. I used to spend hours each day on Java games. Really, the only thing that stopped me was headaches.

        * Almost any - you don’t want a 3 year old calling 911 for fun

    • aaand next time they’ll leave their cell phone home to not get tracked, so not only do you not get their location, they can’t even call you in an emergency

      good parenting, i guess

  • Monkey With A Shell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    This isn’t new, cell tower triangulation is a fact of the network operation and is part of how your signal gets handed off between towers as you travel. Airplane wouldn’t do anything unless it where to actually disable the sim entirely, and functionally even that doesn’t cut it in the USA given that a device without one can still connect to emergency services via any tower in reach.

    This is just the carrier giving a customer the data that would already exist, for a price, which I thought T-Mo actually used to give for free…

    • @corvus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1221 days ago

      The carrier can track a phone without sim card but it’s not the case if you turn on airplane mode. The whole point of airplane mode is to prevent the phone from emitting any signal to avoid interference with critical aircraft instruments. I don’t see any company risking to circumvent such a critical security feature, it would be easily verifiable.

  • @800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1119 days ago

    Or, “hey we’ve been doing this for the police and gov’t for free and we have the tech so why not sell it?”

  • @J52@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1021 days ago

    Daylight robbery… Who’s still this mentally deprived to get another subscription based anything?

    • @throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      721 days ago

      If you want to install free tracking tools, you’ll need consent or try to guess the lockscreen password to try to install it covertly.

      With this, its doesn’t require consent, since most families are on the same family plan.

      Only abusers would use this, since a normal person who actually cares about a family member’s safety would just ask them to install a tracking app voluntarily and be transparent about it.

      Its tracking either way, but doing so voluntarily is way less creepy and also free.

      Most modern Android and iOS allows you to share your locations for free via Google and Apple “Find My Phone” networks.

    • dustycups
      link
      fedilink
      920 days ago

      I have very mixed feelings about androids crash detection. The personal privacy is fine but - fucking google.

      • @NightShot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        520 days ago

        Didn’t know there existed a crash detection function. I just share my location to her all the time. She does the same. Yeah I agree but I rather let my wife relax than not knowing. My point is that not all loses of privacy have to be bad.

      • @octobob@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        319 days ago

        My fiance triggers his all the time by air drumming or throwing his phone around haha.

        It’ll be like “were you in a crash?? Do you wanna call 911??”

      • @Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        220 days ago

        You supposedly hate Google, yet have an android… The fuck is wrong with you?

          • @Xanza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            120 days ago

            De-googled projects get none of the benefit of being android, while all of the downfall of being android. So either use it or don’t. It simply doesn’t make any sense.

            It’s like buying a Tesla and then replacing all of the systems within it because you hate Tesla. Like, wtf. Why would you buy it then? End of the day its your money, do what you want, but still. What the fuck.

              • @Xanza@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                120 days ago

                Google Play Services is at the very core of Android and it will only get worse from here, and a very significant portion of the Android ecosystem requires GPS to function. Auto updates, built-in Android security features, a significant portion of secure apps like banking and financial service applications, Find my Phone, Cloud Backups, etc. The list goes on. And it’s funny because each one of these removed features are generally replaced with a third party alternative, which means you’re still trusting a third party with your data… I could understand if you didn’t want any company to have your data. That makes sense. But you specifically curtail Google who authors the OS in favor of a third party who also might be doing the same things with your data anyways. It’s all just so incredibly stupid.

                You may be completely happy with Graphene, but the overwhelming vast majority of people won’t be because it removes the specific advantages of using Android as an ecosystem.

                If you want to be free of Google, then be free of Google and don’t use hardware and an OS that they designed and made. It’s like hating Nazi’s but wearing an SS jacket because “it’s warm.” It’s fuckin’ mind-blindingly crazy.

                • @pineapple@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  419 days ago

                  I’m totally on engineeringgamings side. Both apple and Google are both bad companies imo but the Android operating system is probably the best thing Google has made and you have the ability to use it without any of the Google services.

                  I take advantage of side loading on a daily basis with repository’s like f droid and accresent as well as obtanium for installing apps from the source. And for the few apps I need i can use the aurora store all with never signing in with a google account.

                  For me the main feature of Android is side loading and I can take full advantage of that with no google account. In my opinion the idea of an ecosystem is a negative, i want the ability to not be locked in to any specific hardware or software vendor.

        • dustycups
          link
          fedilink
          119 days ago

          Plenty.
          TBH I got a pixel, then life got in the way before installing GrapheneOS.

    • @ka1ikasan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      119 days ago

      Same here even without dangerous activities. I may look up where my partner is at the end of the working day. Still in the office? May be a rough day, I can think about some nice dinner and serve a glass of wine 30 seconds before she comes back home.

  • @MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    920 days ago

    I have been thinking about how or if I would track my own children. I do not have any at the moment though.

    I think the only system that would work with tracking and still be ethical is a system with accountability.

    They need to know that I would never check unless there was an emergency. So we’d have to have some sort of immutable log that they can check regularly. So they know if I checked their location. It should not be like a panopticon. in which they don’t know if the parent is checking their location or not. That changes behaviour. Even with the trust that I would not check, just me having the option would alter behaviour probably.

    Youth and kids are independent individuals with their own rights to privacy, autonomy, right to select their own friends and acquaintences, right to freedom of expression and movement, right to make mistakes, etc. If they are thought right and have a high trust bond with their parents, preferably with little judgement, then it will probably be fine and most issues can be solved.

    • @cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      419 days ago

      A reciprocal arrangement would also work. My little terror will soon be at the point of having a mobile phone. My wife and I already share locations in real time. They will get the same arrangement. We can check on them, however, they can also check on our location. Moving on from this, in the future will be a negotiation, not an ultimatum.

      It’s also worth noting however, that a level of accountability is required with phones and social media for children. Knowing that mum or dad might go through their phone to check things makes them think about what they are doing. It is also required to make sure they don’t err too badly. The key is to be open, clear and reasonable in your requirements of them. Also, never mock or belittle. To you, it might be a cute minor kids spat. To them, it’s the life or death of their entire social life.

      If you have a good relationship with your children, these will be a non-issues. Mutual respect (not fear) is a FAR better position to take, parenting wise.

      • Knowing that mum or dad might go through their phone to check things makes them think about what they are doing spend 5 minutes researching how to hide stuff. Better to rely on trust then on pure force alone

        • @cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          419 days ago

          There’s trust in intent and trust in judgement. My goal is to train them so that I can trust their intent. Any search will be to cover lapses in judgement. If they are hiding things, then that is intentional. If they have thought about it enough to hide it, then at least they have thought about it.

          My intent is to spot things like grooming, or bullying (at a level they can’t cope with). Things they might not understand the severity at the time. It gives us a nuclear option, it won’t be used lightly.

    • @tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      219 days ago

      Yeah making it optional for them to turn on because they are still entitled to privacy even though they are children is the key to building trust. Them trusting you as a parent is the most essential thing here, there is always a way around something, you want them being honest by choice rather than sneaky or you forcing “honesty” by coercion.

      We always did that from when the kids were younger and my now adult daughter still chooses to turn it on when going on dates.

  • Matt
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Find My and Google’s device locator service exist, they’re free and work without a carrier. Ik they’re not that private, but you save money at least and they’re more private than your carrier.

    /s

    • @ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      121 days ago

      But you need geolocation. This, at least, can track you scarily accurate. Cannot escape it except you have more money depending on which situation. (Like parents giving it for free to the child, so the only escape is to either have secretly a second phone with own carrier plan or be open and purchase your own carrier plan by gaslighting its needed)

      • Matt
        link
        fedilink
        320 days ago

        Or maybe a prepaid SIM card where you top up your credit.

  • @Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    These are great services. Insane that they charge for them but there are great use cases. Sorry kids, but parents need to know where you are.

      • @Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        220 days ago

        No but my daughter does and knowing her mom and me can track her in the event of an emergency is a big relief for her and us. It lets her have more freedom and confidence then if we didn’t have it

    • Dzso
      link
      fedilink
      521 days ago

      I’m sure that the “consent” is part of the terms and conditions when you sign up for a line on a family plan. Not that it’s genuinely informed consent, or that people know what they agreed to, but technically