• @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I never felt Harris actually stood for anything. This is easily the first election where I felt all the decisions made by the DNC were hard wrong - and I already thought the DNC fucked everything up when the turned on Sanders - but this time they really chose every bad option they could. A senior citizen that was absolutely having problems (outside the debate performance) and choosing an inclusivity* candidate that really had a checkered past of making climbing the ladder a priority while having no real policy gains or stances. Even in the lead up to everything, the other candidates were all but brushed aside. No real debate over policy or where the country was going.

    She said whatever middle of the road thing needed to be said to appeal to enough people while leveling mealy criticism at best for the real problems, from Israel’s shitty war to attacks worker’s right in the US. We went from a candidate that should have never run again to a candidate that hadn’t given anyone a reason to want her to run at all at the last minute. And that’s awful, especially to lose against trump.

    • I hate to even say it, but the fact is that the DNC wanted to run a black female. They banked on the (I can’t think of the word/name for it - people who want to do things for a minority community, but do so cluelessly, remove agency of the group, disregard the actual needs and culture of the group. Usually modestly wealthy white people making “programs” for minority communities) people to vote for the feel-good of voting a minority person up while not actually thinking that people would have needs and policy concerns that would influence their vote, or their willingness to vote at all. The DNC already had “protect the rich white people” as a top priority. They didn’t think people were smart enough to sense that, and everyone really had a feeling that the Democrats didn’t care about them anymore.

    Edit: found it. It’s “white saviorism” or “white savior complex.”

      • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        That’s an interesting video, and I don’t think it defines exactly what I was trying to say, but it absolutely is tangential to it.

        I want to say White Paternalism, where white people think they know what is best for minority groups, but that name often has an association with racism.

        Edit: found it: “white saviorism”

        • @okmko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Ah, saviorism. Yeah that’s definitely what you’re describing.

          I guess what the video is describing is yeah tangential and/or like a superset. Groups high on the power structure use those who’re lower as proxies for their vying for power/resources/etc.

          • Yes, the video definitely suggests groups can be used as pawns and virtue signaling for those trying to “help” or use the appearance of it to further an agenda.

        • @okmko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          17 days ago

          Yeah it’s pretty well researched. It’s kind of jarring viewing these videos now because they describe a time when fascists weren’t nearly so overt.

  • @roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    257 days ago

    I see a lot of these postmortems and I don’t know what combination of them is the actual truth, but I wasn’t the slightest bit surprised when she lost. As soon as she got the nomination I thought it was likely.

    For what it’s worth, here is my take on her as one Californian that’s had to deal with her since before 2010 when she ran for attorney general:

    • Even before she ran for attorney general, I was constantly hearing about all kinds of awful stuff the SF district attorney’s office was doing under her leadership even though I’m not from SF county.
    • I was very disappointed when she got the nomination for attorney general because I didn’t want her policies applied statewide. I voted against her in the primary but of course I held my nose and voted for her over the R in the general.
    • I don’t recall who I voted for in the 2016 primary for Senate but it wasn’t her, or blue dog Sanchez. I think I barely tilted toward Sanchez in the general but I honestly can’t remember. I was so disappointed in those choices that I didn’t really give a shit. I thought we could do better in California than two conserva-dems, especially with the top-2 primary system.
    • Never even considered voting for that cop in a presidential primary.
    • Didn’t like that she was the bottom of the ticket in 2020 especially considering Biden’s age, but the alternative was clear.
    • Of course, due to the alternative I voted for her in 2024 but without one iota of enthusiasm. I think I may have been more enthused to vote for John fucking Kerry, but that was a long time ago, it’s hard to remember my feelings for a block of wood.

    A small silver lining to her losing is I’ll never have to hold my nose and vote for her ever again.

    She lost because she just sucks. Whether an individual’s reason for thinking she sucks and not being excited about her was based on misogyny, racism, her record of public service, her policy goals, or her personality doesn’t matter. I didn’t know anybody excited to vote for her. I knew some people excited to vote for a WOC, but not her as a person. A little enthusiasm was what was needed to turn the tide in the three states that mattered this time.

    As soon as Biden dropped out too late for an actual primary, we already lost.

    • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      17 days ago

      LMAO drop the act, you and all Dems know that if they run her again you WILL VOTE for her, no matter what

      Until the Dem party tells you to vote someone else

  • Lord Wiggle
    link
    fedilink
    167 days ago

    Yeah, but Trump does the same. Kamala had better taxes planned for the working class and the poor. Trump also has a very poor track record. You can blame Kamala for not doing it right, but imo the issue is mass disinformation and people being extremily dumb.

    • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 days ago

      DNC is an enemy of the people.

      Sure, they might not be starting concentration camps and sieg heiling. but the actions they have taken have directly enabled the ones who are goose stepping down Pennsylvania avenue.

        • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 days ago

          DNC has repeatedly refused to listen to the demands on their voters, too, and actively sabotaged candidates the people want to try and force HRC and Harris down our throats… to a massive collective tanking that had nothing to do with their gender, and opening the door to the usurpation of America to foreign powers and money.

      • @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        16 days ago

        The “nice” style liberals have no tools to fight actual fascists. They’re career politicians. They don’t understand an ideological opponent.

        They don’t get that these people will literally demolish governments, throw us into civil wars, and poison the planet for all humanity, rather than feel their power to dominate the weak diminished by one nanoangstrom.

    • @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      16 days ago

      In FPTP, you don’t have much choice but to vote against what you don’t want, but I would argue that it’s still important to vote, so long as that isn’t all that you do.

      I’m also living under FPTP, and voted “third party” because I believe a plurality of choices is beneficial, even though our conservative party was scary close to winning… but that’s just how it’ll always end up under FPTP: the right end will get more and more ghoulish until the centrist party is the safest vote in opposition. Together, they both suck up all the votes into the neoliberal duopoly, where neither side meaningfully challenges the underlying conditions that make life worse for increasingly large sections of people.

      Anyway, of arguably greater impact than voting is actually figuring out who represents you, and letting them know what’s important to you. Canvassing for candidates who you actually do support. That sort of thing.

      Sorry about the little rant. I’m sure you’re aware of this dynamic. I just felt compelled.

  • @RiceBowl@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    A few posts down in my feed is a photo of children zip tied in immigration court and it is fucking disgusting. There would be other problems in a Harris admin. But maybe we wouldn’t zip tie little kids.

  • @GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    97 days ago

    I blame on dnc. They should not exist. We already have republican party if we need to vote for a party that works for billionaires. Unless AOC or Bernie, this country is doomed.

  • Yeah. The DNC either don’t realise, or refuse to realise, that electing Trump is not in approval of him, but expression of disapproval of the Democratic Party.

  • @CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    57 days ago

    It is perfectly fine, in fact it would be incredibly refreshing & welcome, to admit…she was a shitty candidate. Fuck, she was so terribly bad. And Tim Walz was a bad pick, too.

    Everything was fake. Every day it unraveled more. She was caught saying things like, “I am different than Biden, I am not Biden, do not let his presidency reflect on me.” What would you do differently? “Nothing, I wouldn’t change anything.” Okay…so…how are you different if everything Biden did was totally great & you wouldn’t do anything differently?? 🤡 Heavily paraphrased, of course, the convos were more detailed (which only made it worse).

    It’s fine to say Kamala Harris was a cringe candidate. Completely unwanted, unelected, unqualified. Biden bowed out & the DNC shoved her in; there is no logical reason to continue to own her as your candidate & representative. You don’t bring dead babies to Passover. This is an opportunity to rebrand the Democrat Party, to refocus on issues that actually matter. That is to say…if anyone still gives a goddamn about the issues that actually matter.

  • @QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    37 days ago

    She is a black women : Minus 500 Points for Gryfindor.

    She walks in in a businessdress and looks as intimidating as the mortage lady from the bank: Minus 600 Points for Gryfindor

    Her Party is made up from literal Fossils that won’t give up power, even past 80, won’t stop Making money from what seems like Stocktrading on privileged information: Minus 50 Points for Gryfindor.

    She is as charismatic as Porridge: Minus 100 Points for Gryfindor.

    Seriously fuck the bitch ass american racists and the democratic party that can’t find a good candidate when so much is on the line.

  • @hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    27 days ago

    Kamala Harris just chooses whatever she thinks will further her career. She chose poorly. She’s just lucky the party was stupid enough to have elevated her to vice president even after her debate performance was so bad that she dropped out before the 2020 presidential race even started. Then the idiotic party elevated her again after Biden (another opportunist piece of garbage who was elevated by the party) was forced to step down after his embarrassing 2024 debate performance was obvious to even deluded party insiders.