You must log in or register to comment.
“An editor has nominated this article for deletion.”
Haha
God, that has got to be one of the lamest deletion discussions in history. “It’s not relevant because its just a passing term that everyone will forget about in a month” ffs.
An editor has nominated this article for deletion.
Who knew Trump was editing Wikipedia on his off-time?!
Just a killjoy. They are an accomplished wikipedian, but sometimes as they become more senior, it gets to their head. Most people are voting to keep it
AI slop is still AI slop
Is all AI-generated content considered slop?
If someone adds to the AI output in a way that creates something interesting it wouldn’t be slop. Like taking AI output as a base and cleaning up the defects and adding details could be art in the same way that adding or remixing existing media can be art.
This particular image is absolute slop. He has troll doll hair instead of feathers around his neck and on his head. The lighting sucks. The textures suck. The makeup sucks. The smiling out of focus people in the background suck.
I have only seen a few AI images that were not easily recognizable as slop, and that was because they were a direct rip off of talented artists and if they were done as an algorithm the quality would have been higher.
Awww you hurt the maga fucktards feelings.
The only good Nazi is a dead one, and then only posthumously.
The downvotes are because of the AI slop which looks like total shit. It would be funny if a person made it.
So, you’re happy with being shown AI slop so long as it falls under your viewpoint? This isn’t even close to decent slop, it’s pretty horrible.
I just want to take a second to thank my 7 supporters, it means the world to me.
But to all the haters out there who don’t appreciate the 2 seconds it took to generate this masterpiece… bless your hearts 🥰
