• @gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 minutes ago

    Throw Musk in prison for his many documented crimes, but don’t support this kind of dictator shit.

  • @laber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 hours ago

    The nationalization of SpaceX will mean a slowdown in development, like in the case of NASA.

  • @postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2915 hours ago

    Arrest Musk on violation of controlled substances acts, file immigration violation charges, invalidate his ownership shares due to securities fraud, as he falsified education and naturalization forms.

    Or just emminent domain the shit. The Law is just made up right now.

  • @Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1214 hours ago

    No, they’re fine remaining as private companies. If the government wants to better control over the companies then they can pass regulation and if they want total control then they can build their own alternatives. Nationalization of companies should never be used as a political weapon.

  • mechoman444
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1516 hours ago

    The precedent that will set and the implications… No… We should not do this.

    • @pneumatron@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2215 hours ago

      Health insurance, ISP, Oil Cos, and utilities should also be nationalized. The US is a weird place where everything is a business. A shithole capitalist hellscape

    • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 hours ago

      The precedent that will set and the implications

      and what precedent is there for dealing with the executive of your country’s entire space launch infrastructure when they become dependent on horse drugs?

      No really, what’s the precedent here, I want to know. Because if we set a precedent by ignoring it until the problem is impossible to ignore, that’s gonna be a far more expensive fix.

      So yeah, yeah we should consider this very strongly.

  • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2117 hours ago

    I’ve been saying this for years. the footprint that spaceX represents in national launch authority is out of whack to say the least.

    • @postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      815 hours ago

      The only reason SpaceX exists is because Boeing and Lockheed managed to compete so badly the only solution was to merge their launch businesses.

      So we had one launch company, then spaceX made it two providers, now its back to one because B-mart is using antiquated launch systems (single use).

      • @mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        514 hours ago

        this isn’t incorrect. ULA is a fucking pork barrel of hideous proportions. doesn’t mean we shouldn’t nationalize spacex.

        • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          413 hours ago

          You don’t nationalise a company (SpaceX) just because the existing government owned company (NASA) is significantly worse. What do you think would happen to SpaceX if they did nationalise it? Lol. It would go to hell, like NASA.

          The government should not be responsible for things like this. The government should provide services for necessities for human rights and general standards of living, but they shouldn’t take over successful companies just because they couldn’t do it themselves.

          • @TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            98 hours ago

            We shot a space telescope half way to the sun and are observing the dawn of the entire universe.

            And you just wanna see a bigger penis rocket🌈

            • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              120 minutes ago

              Sending something one way into space isn’t hard. Having it come back is. Having it, and all the parts that it took to get it there and back, be safely returned to earth and able to be reused is stupidly hard.

            • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 hours ago

              And why do you think they have zero budget? The government lol. You think if the same government takes over SpaceX they’ll all of a sudden give them the huge budget that they need?

            • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 hours ago

              You haven’t put your eggs in any basket. SpaceX are a private company. The government owns NASA, they can pour money into that and hire people to do what SpaceX are doing. Hell, they could poach people from SpaceX!

              Why do you think they haven’t already done this? Because the government don’t care about it. If someone else will do it they can use them to provide their services via ludicrously expensive contracts, and give them massive subsidies, as is the Government way.

              The government taking over SpaceX is not something anyone with even half a brain should be wanting. It makes ZERO sense. It doesn’t matter who owns it privately, just not the government because they will fuck it up and/or neglect it - like they did with NASA and most of their other projects.

                • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  18 hours ago

                  That’s not putting eggs in a basket, that’s just wasteful government as always. The same government that you guys want to take control of SpaceX lol.

    • MrSpArkle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      715 hours ago

      SpaceX and Starlink basically have no competition, and if they did, said competitor would also need to be heavily subsidized.

      • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        413 hours ago

        These last few years they’ve had very little successes, but the point is it should stay competitive and not be automatically handed to these doofuses. Even the USSR maintained a competitive rocketry sector.

          • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            312 hours ago

            Compared to previously SpaceX has been seeing more and more failed launches, Starlink is banned in a number of countries and there are already other low orbit internet satellite providers popping up.

            • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 hours ago

              You say “failed”, engineers say “ok what have we learned and what can we improve/fix from this?”. These launches are tests. Every single launch is testing every single part of the hardware and software. Tests failing isn’t a bad thing, as it helps you fix problems and make things better.

              • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 minutes ago

                They are years behind schedule and obscenely over budget on this testing. They’re not even making new technology here, they are just cheaping out on the builds to funnel money into their own pockets.

    • @ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      517 hours ago

      NASA hasn’t take the slightest risk since Challenger. They wouldn’t have accomplished 1/20th of the launch capability SpaceX has developed in the last 5 years.

        • @ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It’s the specification process that’s the thing, nobody there would have gone out on a limb the way SpaceX has with their recovery systems. Look where they are on a shuttle replacement: the Apollo capsule with more room.

  • @FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    513 hours ago

    That would literally be the worse thing that could happen with regards to them, because they only exist and thrived because they are private enterprise. If the government were capable of doing what those companies do and doing it well, SpaceX and Starlink wouldn’t exist in the first place.

    Can you even imagine just how much money would be wasted and misused and unaccounted for, while nothing actually got done?

    Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is delusional

  • @Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I think that’s a complicated question. It’s both yes and no. Yes, we should nationalize them. No, nationalizing them should not be by tRump. That sets the precedent, or at least reinforces, the concept that the architecture of industry can be nationalized as payback for petty political squabbling. They should be nationalized, however, because fElon has proven himself to be unstable, reckless, petty, and a risk to the nation.