• @slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    70
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Being a billionaire (aka wealth hoarder) is a mental illness.

    If they were hoarding anything else to this extent, going way beyond their rational needs, e.g. billions of tables, pokemon cards or toilet papers, everybody would know they are insane. But as it’s money, somehow they are supposed to be the smartest people in the world, and we should worship them.

    • @JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      188 days ago

      This. It’s literally no different, and the fact that so many people idolise this kind of hoarding shows how powerful the processes of hegemony are.

    • @slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      137 days ago

      If there are 10 monkeys in a zoo and they give them 10 oranges a day as a treat and one of the monkeys would hoard 6 oranges every day and left them to rot. Do you think that the zookeepers would keep an eye on it because it’s clearly mentally ill or an asshole, or would they point at it and go: damn, that’s one cool and smart monkey.

      • @slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        67 days ago

        Great example, makes the contrast even more obvious. Insane people are controlling the world, and we are wondering why it’s going to shit

      • It’s a bad example, because we are not monkeys, we lack zookeepers and money normally rots only at a much, much slower rate than oranges and increases itself over a certain threshold

        • @Honytawk@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Only if they are in captivity.

          In the wilderness they share their resources. The strongest would defend the weakest, especially if they had an orange.

    • @ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 days ago

      You can’t really do anything useful with a billion Pokémon cards, there’s always something you can do with a billion dollars

    • @AreaKode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      318 days ago

      As in, they’re power tripping? Absolutely. When you get a false sense of importance, especially when you have sycophants reinforcing this image, narcissists in particular tend to act poorly toward their fellow human beings.

      • AmbitiousProcess
        link
        fedilink
        English
        238 days ago

        This is one of the best reasons to socially stigmatize wealth hoarding, even if you can’t change the fundamentals of the capitalist system that causes it in the first place.

        If enough people make people who hoard money feel lesser than, to the point that having less is a preferable alternative, then they’re more likely to give away their wealth and become at least a little bit less shitty people.

        This is also, coincidentally, why rich people isolate themselves within bubbles of similarly rich individuals, who won’t look down on them for being so greedy and narcissistic.

      • @LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 days ago

        This is why we should have mandatory testing for NPD and be institutionalising anyone who tests positive. Narcissists cannot be allowed to walk the streets freely, their mental illness is too dangerous.

    • Owl
      link
      fedilink
      128 days ago

      And the inverse statement too: If normal people became billionaires, they would act stupidly too

    • @shplane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87 days ago

      And if normal people suddenly became billionaires, they’d act just as awful as the current billionaires

    • @Onionguy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      168 days ago

      Imagine if people who really should go to therapy (like melon usk in this one) actually went to therapy.

    • dustycups
      link
      fedilink
      97 days ago

      The solution might not be easy but it is simple: tax. Good on the cuurent Australian governments increased taxation of superannuation over 3 million $.

        • dustycups
          link
          fedilink
          16 days ago

          Not disagreeing with you but this particular tax is on wealth. Imo there is a place for both.