• @enthusiasticamoeba@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Is $47 considered a good deal in the states nowadays? Before I left (2015) I was paying about $80/month.

    Now I’m in the Netherlands and I pay $7/month. I don’t remember what my plan is but it’s something like 8gb data and more minutes/SMS than I could ever use.

    Cell/internet/TV plans are a total racket in the US.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
      link
      fedilink
      English
      225 minutes ago

      Nah, I pay about $25 a month for unlimited talk, text, and 35 GB of high speed data before being dropped from priority. It helps its a MVNO, which is the term for companies that use the networks and infrastructure of the big 3 cellular telecomms without needing to physically maintain them.

    • @iowagneiss@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Not really. I’m on Visible Wireless prepay and pay $25/month for unlimited data, including unlimited hotspot (rate limited at 5 mb/s on the hotspot).

      If it’s a post-pay plan, then it might be competitive, as the rates are around what you remember for those. Since they’re talking about a $500 phone instead of “free with plan,” I’m assuming it’s prepaid where you have to buy the phone separately.

      Edit: okay, read the article and it’s prepaid. It’s not a good value and is easily beat my several existing services.

  • 4grams
    link
    English
    26 hours ago

    Why do we need celebrity owned cell carriers? This article makes it sound like a bad thing Ryan Reynolds’s exited Mint, but at least the stars of arrested development still have a cell provider.

    I mean WTF, I like that there is competition but what the fuck is wrong with us that we prefer celebrity endorsement to actual features, value, longevity, etc.

    I know it’s a bigger question than what I’m asking but this is all part of the rot that our economy is experiencing. All vibes, all promises, all scams, this country runs on nothing but grift.

  • @Hupf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5023 hours ago

    Is this

    Phone service under the direct control of the President of the United States of America 🦋

    Small government?

    • @EldenLord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 hours ago

      Biometals are way cooler anyways. Copper? Zinc? Cobalt? Molybdenum? Iron? Tin? Manganese?

      All these are essential to our life and provide actual use compared to the utter lifeless and obsolete gold that only serves greed among the ghouls chasing it.

        • Jyek
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          Plus you can drink vodka with bits of it in.

          And afterwards you can literally shit gold!

  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Looking at the webpage, it’s obviously a 100% Chinese product licensing the Trump name.

    There are numerous errors on the page, from a processor section that doesn’t list a processor, RAM that’s described as storage, and the boast of a “5000mAh long life camera,” when it presumably means the battery.

    If you ever thought the Trumps weren’t grifters, this should clear it up:

    “Trump Mobile is going to revolutionize cellphones, mobile calling,” Eric Trump told Fox News

    There’s absolutely nothing revolutionary here. It’s a cheap Chinese phone in a tacky case and an overpriced very-not-new MVNO phone service.

    • @CPMSP@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      819 hours ago

      I’m other words, it’s just another example of how not to do business that all the rubes will throw money at.

      Awesome.

    • @blackbarn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2424 hours ago

      That’s all he’s ever done. License his name. Trump steaks. Trump water. Trump University. List goes on