Brett Wilkins Jun 16, 2025

Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.

Military-focused news sites reported that around 30 U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers were identified by flight-tracking software in what The Times of Israelcalled an “unprecedented mass deployment” to Europe.

  • @Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 hours ago

    If the shit hits the fan, I want too see every single fucking MAGA voter at a US Army recruiting office signing up for 11 Bravo, Grunt Infantry.

  • @sudo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 hours ago

    This would have to be the most unpopular war in US history and yet I think everyone Trump has surrounded himself with is telling him to do it.

    • @smayonak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 minutes ago

      This might sound insane but every single wartime president has gotten a huge boost to their approval ratings due to media networks circulating pure propaganda nonstop. Even NPR will start doing positive coverage.

  • @catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 hours ago

    I fucking hate this rhetoric which is: OIL! GAS! BUY OIL! BUY GAS! KEEP PUTIN HAPPY! OIL! GAS!

    No one was taking the ‘war’ between Israel and Iran seriously last week because the USA was like… “yeah, nah”. Now, after a quick call from Putin and bam, all this BS about how the US is pandering for war when it’s a nothingburger.

    Remember kids, buy oil, buy gas and do as you’re told.

  • @kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 hours ago

    A-10 movement always preceeds ground deployments. They moved those to Kuwait at the end of March. This has been coming for a while, its not an unplanned thing like it appears.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      He also said if he was president there’d be no more wars, so this obviously totally super duperly cannot happen.

    • @kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 hours ago

      He openly calls service members suckers and losers. I dont know that he much cares whats done with them.

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, it seems fairly impossible he’ll get fully into the war, and even lending a few bunker busters would be surprising when that’s risking a blowback on American forces.

      I would guess that Trump is expecting Khamenei to cave, because that’s what he’d do. Most likely, he won’t, Trump will be confused, and this will drag on and on until a regional nuclear exchange is on the table.

        • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          32 minutes ago

          Iran or Iran’s splinter states. They have several bombs worth of uranium that’s almost ready.

          I doubt the US would get involved, and nobody else is going to for sure.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 hours ago

          Hasn’t Iran been talking about ramping up nuclear weapons production since like the end of last year? I don’t think they’re actually a nuclear capable nation but I could see them posturing like they are

    • @HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      Any tips? Like do I hoard rice, beans, sugar, spices, things I can trade with other people?

      Should I get a pro-grade slingshot, maybe a bow and arrow?

      • @Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        Learn high-density home gardening and safe food preservation. That said, white rice does store a long time so it’s a good thing to hoard if you’re worried about food availability.

      • @throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        Don’t ask me for tips.

        I’d probably just kill myself, I wouldn’t have the will to live.

        I hope reincarnation is real and I get to be born in an advanced post-scarcity civillization somewhere out there in the universe/multiverse where I can enjoy hundreds orntousands of years being a captain of a starship just mapping the universe.

        Unfotunately, that’s just me daydreaming, its too far fetched to be real.

        (Okay maybe get some ham radios and some portable ones, stored in an EM-Shielded container with some solar panel batteries? Communication might be important. But, ask yourself: do you really want to live in a nuclear apocalypse?)

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1412 hours ago

      No.

      We had a lot of “I’m willing to make deals with anyone” rhetoric from the Trump campaign that low-info voters took to mean he was anti-war.

      But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter). Its all the same neoconservative think tanks writing variations on Project For A New American Century for the modern government.

      The idea that you were going to elect an anti-war president went out the window during the primaries. Vanishingly few federal office holders have shown opposition to attacking Iran. Less than what we had in 2003 against Iraq.

      Everyone from Richie Torres to Mike Lee seem on board with a brand new Holocaust in the Middle East.

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter).

        That’s not strictly true. Trump purged a lot of leadership that was loyal to the Constitution rather than personally to him.

        But your overall point about the war-hawkishness remains valid.

    • @ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1813 hours ago

      Everyone knew he wasn’t going to be able to curtail democratic elections without the excuse of a war. This is on schedule.

        • @Dogyote@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 hours ago

          Nah, a war in the middle east is normal. Nobody would accept a normal situation as justification to cancel elections.

    • @Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1815 hours ago

      No US president is a peace dove. Between supporting proxie wars to police actions to declared war, they all end up getting people killed by bombs.

  • @Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6917 hours ago

    This is basic dictator playbook, problems in domestic politics, start a war and problems change to foreign policy.

    Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

      The United Russia party has had a chokehold on Russian elections practically since the day the USSR was dismantled.

      There’s a lot more to their socio-economic dominance than Russia just starting new wars. RU controls the national media, they have deep roots in petrochemicals and finance and real estate, they’re mobbed up, they have control of the military across the officer’s corps, and they’re embedded all through local government.

      Putin could be the biggest peacenik hippie in Russia and that party wouldn’t budge from its perch.

      He’s doing these wars because he’s fascist. Not because he’s doing 11D politics chess.

      • @Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Starting a war isn’t really 11D thing, it is more like “me big army, me attack” vibe. Even the orange orangutan can figure that one out.

        Russia has two exports, fossil energy and war. They know nothing else.

        Putin and his party are one and the same.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 hours ago

          Russia has two exports, fossil energy and war.

          Russia is the only country left with a functioning space program. Also, one of the few remaining virgin steel manufacturers, in large part thanks to their domestic supply of iron and cheap energy. And, like Ukraine, it is a major regional breadbasket (one of the knock on effects of the war has been a one-two punch to cereal exports into Africa and the Middle East).

          They don’t have the manpower that China and India enjoy, so they never properly built up their high end service and manufacturing base, even in the Soviet Era. But the “Russia’s just an oversized gas station” line doesn’t hold up to any kind of close inspection.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              60% of their export is fossil energy

              China, India, and Turkiye have been ravenous in their demand for petrochemicals. These sectors have been growing at a breakneck pace.

              it is a banana republic

              Which large US business conglomerate is extracting fruit produce from Russia through armed occupation at below market rates?

              • @Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 hours ago

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

                “In political science, the term banana republic describes a politically and economically unstable country with an economy dependent upon the export of natural resource.”

                They are so dependable on fossil fuel export that they try to sway all other nations to use fossil fuels and generate crisis on it to tie other nations closer to it’s only source of power in global market. Russia has less GDP than Italy. They are not super power anymore, and every nation should try to get away from their fossil fuels.

                • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 hours ago

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

                  it came to control vast territories and transportation networks in Central America, the Caribbean coast of Colombia, and the West Indies. Although it competed with the Standard Fruit Company (later Dole Food Company) for dominance in the international banana trade, it maintained a virtual monopoly in certain regions, some of which came to be called banana republics – such as Costa Rica, Honduras, and Guatemala.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic#Etymology

                  In the early 20th century, the United Fruit Company, a multinational corporation, was instrumental in the creation of the banana republic phenomenon. Together with other American corporations, such as the Cuyamel Fruit Company, and leveraging the power of the U.S. government, the corporations created the political, economic, and social circumstances that led to a coup of the locally elected democratic government that established banana republics in Central American countries such as Honduras and Guatemala; No official apology has ever been done by any banana company or the U.S. with only the C.I.A. backed dictator of Guatemala apologizing in 2011

                  :-|

                  They are so dependable on fossil fuel export that they try to sway all other nations to use fossil fuels

                  Ah, Okay. I think I understand the problem here.

      • @Zenith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 hours ago

        Everything you said is true of the GOP/American Right as well, and they do it the same way, through oligarchy, it’s just a matter of they having more time to ratchet it down where the US is just getting its official start, although it’s been working behind the scenes towards this for decades too

    • @OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3017 hours ago

      This is why I say Canada, Greenland, and Mexico are not safe. Added to the fact that all 3 countries have lots of resources the US needs.

        • @driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 hours ago

          If the US ever try to take out the Panama channel it would fuck up bigly international commerce. Basically only the US military is going to use it because no insurance company is going to cover ships going through them, and without insurance ships can’t even leave port.

      • @null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1215 hours ago

        Wouldn’t this cause catastrophic domestic problems though. I think the US would tear itself apart trying to go to war with either of those three. Greenland perhaps less-so but still incredibly distasteful.

  • @kayky@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Time to waste hundreds of billions defending israel while our infrastructure crumbles and our citizens still go without healthcare.

    Again.