• Neuromancer49@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hot take, I’ll offer an alternative perspective. Obviously, poaching is one of the most disgusting crimes. Sourcing animal parts for folk remedies is reprehensible.

    Responsibly managed hunting generates a ton of money, some of which which gets invested into the local community and into conservation efforts.

    The key word here is responsible. If a land manager shared wealth in an equitable fashion with the locals, and demonstrates careful management of animal herds by close monitoring of populations, that’s responsibility. I wouldn’t want to hunt on lands owned by, say, a literal nazi in South Africa. But, unfortunately, as long as we live under capitalism, I have a hard time imagining a different way to encourage the world to preserve our natural resources.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t disagree but I also think it’s fair game for the hunted to win. That should be part of the point of big game hunting, it’s fucking dangerous and tbh it’s a little satisfying as a poor when the buffalo beats the millionaire in a battle to the death the millionaire started

      • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        True in many cases but not all, and the people managing these populations are almost never directly responsible for the problem. For example the species I now help manage in my country were introduced generations before my birth. Same for the overwhelming majority of the land clearing, it was done before even my parents existed.

        I can’t change history, but I can take some responsibility for mitigating the damage of those who came before me.