• Grenfur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here’s the thing. When I talk to friends interested in Linux, it’s always Debian or Fedora that I suggest. I think they draw a good line for what the average user wants and needs and they’re stable. In fact, I used Fedora for a long time, and all my homelab stuff runs Debian. It wasn’t until computers themselves became a hobby that I switched to Arch. And I think that’s likely the cutoff. If you’re a computer user, stable distros are great. If you’re more a hobbiest… Well, the Arch wiki can own your free time.

    • sunstoned@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Man I wish I could do more with my new computer” – Fedora

      “Yeah I just want to breathe some new life into this old laptop and have it last me until the end of time” – Debian

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Normal distro -> arch -> gentoo -> nixOS -> QubesOS -> Debian pipeline.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Thats what you think you want but by the time you’re at the end of the pipeline you just want a computer that works.

            • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              So far, that’s exactly why I’ve stopped at Nix.

              Everything is declared exactly how I want it. If something would break, it just bails on the update. If I want to set up a new machine, I just clone my config and build it.

              I’m not sure what could be more “just works” than that.