Permanently Deleted

  • @TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1082 years ago

    I’m more surprised that the folks at OpenAI saw fit to fire him than I am that he committed fireable offenses.

      • peopleproblems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 years ago

        But what he lied about is probably bigger news.

        This has corporate PR speak all over it, but it is clear that it was circumventing the desires of the Board, and the chairman of the Board steps down as well.

        The absolute hell happened?

        • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 years ago

          If I had to guess, about how interested he was in keeping it non-profit in spirit. Which direction he believed in, I have no idea. I don’t know him or the board. The statement sounds like the board is leaning toward non-profit behavior, but I don’t believe a company who merely says “do no evil”.

  • @zorlan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    892 years ago

    The company is now actually being run by ChatGPT, Mira is just the face it’s hiding behind.

    • rynzcycle
      link
      fedilink
      612 years ago

      I asked Bard to give me a generic reason for firing a CEO.

      Certainly, here are some vague reasons for firing the CEO of an AI company:
      Leadership concerns: The CEO’s leadership style or personal conduct was not in line with the company’s values or culture. This could include issues such as lack of transparency, poor communication, or ethical breaches.

      Yup.

        • @xantoxis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          No, Bard is just making a prediction based on the way CEO firings are presented in press releases. Those press releases are never the “real” reason, what we’re seeing here is the way a board would frame the firing of its CEO. “Ethical breach” is the term used when “The CEO was killing hookers for fun and WHOO-WEE we did NOT want to get any of that on us,” is not considered appropriate to tell the press.

  • baduhai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 years ago

    I am actually very surprised. Did not see this coming.

    • @BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Microsoft doesn’t have that power, and it has hurt their stock value. Their CEO’s response suggests that Microsoft and other partners didn’t know until everyone else did.

    • stevedidWHAT
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      But they said it was because he wasn’t being totally honest with the board for OpenAI tho

      Corps would never lie to save face or hide truths!!

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    Not exactly surprised here. Every time I’ve seen him on the news, it’s always him fearmongering about the dangers of generative AI, when ChatGPT is burning through money and seemed to become more and more restrictive with every iteration. You can’t run an organization if it is built on top of lies.

    Actually open models (not open source, sadly) like specialized LLaMa 2 derivatives that could be ran and fine-tuned locally seems to be the future, because there seems to be a diminishing return in training/inference power to usefulness, and specialized smaller model tuned for specific applications are much more flexible than a giant general one that can only be used on somebody else’s machine.

  • DreamButt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    OpenAI also announced that co-founder Greg Brockman will be stepping down as chairman of the board, though he will remain at the company.

    Interesting. No way this isn’t connected

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Uhh… Keep reading?

      Hours after it was published, Brockman posted to X that he had quit “based on today’s news.”

      Apologies, looks like that statement may have been added after the fact.

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Oh no, anyways

    This is unprecedented. They let that schmuck at Unity “retire” on a holiday but they fired Sam. Oof.

    It sounds like there was a power struggle over the direction of OpenAI.

    • Dark Arc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mean yeah but also no. I think anyone would be the former guy (i.e., the Sam on the left) over the latter if given the choice.

  • @sugarfree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is really big news, going to be interesting if anything leaks or if we stay in the dark. For Altman to be fired and for them to release a statement like this it has to be something drastic.

  • @jeffw@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    On one hand, this was posted 15 minutes before you posted this… on the other hand, this is a much clearer headline

  • @simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    That sucks, and weirdly sudden too. I don’t like OpenAI but I do like Altman. I saw a lot of the videos he makes and he strikes me as someone that knows what he’s doing and, despite running it as a business, genuinely cares.

    It’s so alarming that he would get suddenly fired when the company is doing so well. Nobody knows what’s going on but I don’t doubt a “company board demands more profit” situation

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You mean the guy who spun this all up as a Non-Profit company, then spun up an LLC for that Non-Profit to manage, then made deals with Microsoft?

      Somehow his long term actions tell me, like most rich twatwaffles, you can’t actually trust what he is saying.

      When the board that he answers to says he hasn’t been consistently candid, you can bet your sweet ass any soundbites you as a regular schlub have read are “not consistently candid” and you’re hearing what he wants you to hear.

      But you do you on believing these chucklefucks when their actions speak loudly to the contrary.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      I saw a lot of the videos he makes and he strikes me as someone that knows what he’s doing and, despite running it as a business, genuinely cares.

      This makes his firing make more sense to me. Boards don’t want a CEO who knows what he’s doing and genuinely cares. They want a CEO who will do their bidding without question, and draw all the flak for their decisions.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        182 years ago

        Nah, competent boards want a CEO that will inspire investor confidence and pull in good numbers. Something Altman was doing in an above-and-beyond fashion.

        I’m sure there was something going on behind the scenes and he pissed off some important bumblefuck.

      • SaltySalamander
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        Your comment was the equivalent of “I have no idea what I’m talking about”

    • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Whatever it was it’s spicy enough that they’re trying to bury the press release in the late Friday afternoon news graveyard

      Edit: even better, whatever they’re trying to distance themselves from is so important they didn’t even wait for the closing bell on the market.

    • @vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I interpret their wording that he lied to the board repeadetly and made some unethical backdoor deals of evil.

        • @modeler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          172 years ago

          Almost certainly the opposite - it’s the board that is non-profit and Sam has been the one bringing billions of dollars of commercially-tied investment

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Makes me wonder if he wanted to put ethical guardrails on the product that would’ve been less profitable for the board.

      • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Those allegations have been floating since ~2021, I have a hard time believing they’d take emergency action on them 2-3y later.