• rozodru@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I do freelance/consultation dev work and I’d say most of my clients are having this problem right now. But this is a problem of their own doing. Most got rid of their dev teams and instead leveraged AI and less than a handful of junior devs to essentially just be prompt monkeys. I eventually get called into these places to code review the slop that got churned out and the majority of the time the solution is to start from scratch without heavily utilizing LLM’s that got them into this situation in the first place. The problem is though they now need to hire competent senior level devs again. But they can’t.

    They place ads on linkedin, indeed, etc and then get absolutely hammered with resumes written by AI. The vast majority of which are resumes from people that are either incredibly unqualified or are from like India. They again had to stop using AI to read them because naturally it’s just pulling the bullshit from the pile of bullshit it’s being fed. The ACTUAL devs that are applying get lost in the shuffle. Now they have to manually comb through all the resumes and verify that they’re not AI crap before even attempting to read it.

    So it wouldn’t surprise me if places are just giving up and no one is getting hired. I can speak for myself and other consultants I personally know that we’re having to turn down work because we’re booked solid and don’t have the time. I’ve run out of people to refer jobs to cause we’re all in the same boat.

    The industry axed a metric shit ton of people and now needs them back and they simply can’t find them.

  • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    The actual bubble that needs to be popped is financialization. The US economy is now completely detached from productivity and is now running on speculation only through financial valuation. At the same time, people are starving, infrastructure is falling apart, the birth rate is plummeting, and suicide is on the rise. It’s time to stop taking “job creators” seriously and use all this fallow professional experience and skill to restart the material economy and forget this pretend crap that keeps plutocrats busy doing nothing of any value to anyone.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      10 days ago

      The US economy is now completely detached from productivity and is now running on speculation

      Yep, the market feels like it’s in max-greed mode. There was a taste of fear when the tariffs were first announced, but wallst was quick to token TACO to justify just ignoring everything. My question for the last 9+ months has been, “how long can a market willingly ignore reality?”

      I assume it will take until a critical mass of those speculators start needing to liquidate. I don’t know what will trigger that, but at some point the profits come due.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 days ago

        My question for the last 9+ months has been, “how long can a market willingly ignore reality?”

        How long did we kick the foundations out of the US dollar when we got rid of the gold standard, and just let it float on speculation and feelings? What, 60-70 years now?

        How long has the stock market existed on the whims of people’s feelings over cold hard statistics and long-term analysis?

        Markets have been ignoring reality for many decades.

        • The_Italian_Uncut@beehaw.orgBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Exactly. Since the end of the gold standard, the economy hasn’t been about production — it’s been about valuation.

          70 years ago, companies were built to make things: cars, fridges, tools. Today, they’re built to inflate stock prices.

          The real product isn’t goods. It’s debt, speculation, planned obsolescence.

          And now, AI isn’t replacing workers to make things better. It’s replacing them to cut costs — while real needs go unmet.

          This isn’t progress. It’s the slow collapse of a system that forgot its purpose.

          • Kichae@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            It’s the slow but inevitable achievement of end-state of a system designed to re-frame and re-centralize power in the hands of the elite following the liberalization of political power.

            This is its purpose. It always has been.

          • jarfil@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            There are two sides to that story.

            There is not enough gold to match the increases in both population and productivity of the last 70 years, and you don’t want just a handful of people holding gold that spikes in value through the roof.

            Smart people invest in companies that pay dividends. Speculators invest in… whatever, tulip bulbs.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      birth rate is the least of our problems, which is one our University staff at my old school were complaining why the enrollment was low asf. No job market, or very low job prospects for stems= low wage cant compete with HCOl areas, hence no children.

  • its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 days ago

    Im going to start physical mailings and cold emails. I’m over this job market, its AI/ATS nonsense, and the people who think its OK.

  • 🐝bownage [they/he]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    On the one hand, it’s nice to be able to have the recruiter AI agent I made write applications for me because I hate that part. After that, I can do the interviews myself just fine and I’m all good.

    On the other hand, it feels disgusting and lazy.

    But it works much better than last time I was job hunting (last year) and did everything by hand.

    It’s showing me that (as far as I can tell) recruiters don’t give a shit and barely read what you send them. They’ll reach out as long as your LinkedIn is SEO optimised.

    Depressing but true

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Nah. When the power turns off, im taking my go bag and living in a library and will continue to ignore the awful world i was forced to live in.

  • The_Italian_Uncut@beehaw.orgBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    This isn’t just ChatGPT vs. HR. It’s a system where automation replaces human labor at every level — from hiring to production.

    I’ve just published an episode on how AI, robotics, and exponential change aren’t just transforming jobs — but possibly the entire future of the economy.

    We’re in a transitional phase. The next few years are crucial.

    So if you’re asking ‘Will AI take your job?’, the deeper question is: What happens when the economy no longer needs people?

    • Blake (he/him) @beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Seems oversimplified and hyperbolic. The economy will always need people because people are the demand. And because markets are largely unpredictable, supply relies on people making strategic decisions. That will never change. Not everything can be quantified, collected, analyzed, and automated

      • The_Italian_Uncut@beehaw.orgBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        You say the economy will always need people because they are the demand. But who buys AI systems? Other companies. Who buys weapons? Governments. Who buys logistics automation? Corporations.

        The demand isn’t from people. It’s from systems that want to eliminate people.

        This isn’t hyperbole. It’s the trend.

        We published an episode on this — not to claim we have all the answers, but to show it’s more complex than ‘people will always be needed’.

        If you’ve listened and still disagree, I’d love to hear your counterpoints. Maybe the real oversimplification is believing we already know how this story ends — before the data is even in.

    • Bababasti@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      These are interesting thoughts you are voicing but your usage of em-dashes is highly suspicious, Mr./Mrs. Robot.

      /s I like these dashes myself as someone who has some sort of education in typography

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    as if they wernt using something similar before the pandemic. they were already using software to screen out applicants by the dozens or hundreds, they are just mad because applicants are doing the same thing to write thier applications. biotech jobs love posting fake listings on the job sites

    before you had to write your own resume, and change everytime for different jobs, now AI can presumbly do all of that sloppily.